From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34763-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LftQg-0003OI-GU
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:06:52 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04431E02D8;
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:06:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.191])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9898EE02D8
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:06:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so415013tid.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:06:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=35JB0U514/i/j9x1Mp7H9PsnE1kNgB+l9qu+kvvw0IE=;
b=vhQUeG15x4nbvu2qiP4zCinGcYH4APS2VB23ACS3vbxz1yorUSwub8XJr0gWUruP7N
7wEjdnXeqftC1jNYGrlIQGoYGHEv+PW31pwvvnW5UMIQqGEkpQJX+S6TaGzOUSOJSvV2
R9Y1dzMYPlbmwSdrCRJDLJLf/SJ5wmXB76tA0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=nYONwUhJNpjGD2+h736cgCGGuKtQ4hYdyVeqRnk5Qty4cPvojHQ92HOl6VtlRGZvoi
fA0c2SNB5Z0OFtaR6QRlUVfketbq1WJ27hwDVcSaS0OS0jRoqqBpsNP9dXCVssu6X+nD
l/a93biLpRQAcRHorkrYxECpfUDMmFlsE4wxY=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.110.42.17 with SMTP id p17mr5099227tip.14.1236420407324; Sat,
07 Mar 2009 02:06:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <18866.17225.129454.389648@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de>
References: <20090306205729.GC22566@comet>
<18866.17225.129454.389648@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:36:47 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ce53224bd2480fde
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0903070206l78e79fefl2247371c9a5a6376@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x-modular.eclass: A modified approach to EAPI
support
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 300f65ae-65f7-44b6-9ca8-0f1ddc9c6dec
X-Archives-Hash: f8fc3eeb2cbe0a32dcdf4f736b9c905e
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>> Any thoughts?
>
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 *)
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 die "Unknown EAPI ${EAPI}"
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ;;
>
> Is is safe to assume that an unknown EAPI will provide a "die"
> function?
>
If we get all Ciaran-ey about that, then we can't even assume the
existence of a case statement in some future version of bash (which is
required by some EAPI)
--=20
~Nirbheek Chauhan