From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LftQg-0003OI-GU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:06:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04431E02D8; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9898EE02D8 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so415013tid.10 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:06:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=35JB0U514/i/j9x1Mp7H9PsnE1kNgB+l9qu+kvvw0IE=; b=vhQUeG15x4nbvu2qiP4zCinGcYH4APS2VB23ACS3vbxz1yorUSwub8XJr0gWUruP7N 7wEjdnXeqftC1jNYGrlIQGoYGHEv+PW31pwvvnW5UMIQqGEkpQJX+S6TaGzOUSOJSvV2 R9Y1dzMYPlbmwSdrCRJDLJLf/SJ5wmXB76tA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nYONwUhJNpjGD2+h736cgCGGuKtQ4hYdyVeqRnk5Qty4cPvojHQ92HOl6VtlRGZvoi fA0c2SNB5Z0OFtaR6QRlUVfketbq1WJ27hwDVcSaS0OS0jRoqqBpsNP9dXCVssu6X+nD l/a93biLpRQAcRHorkrYxECpfUDMmFlsE4wxY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.110.42.17 with SMTP id p17mr5099227tip.14.1236420407324; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:06:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <18866.17225.129454.389648@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20090306205729.GC22566@comet> <18866.17225.129454.389648@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:36:47 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ce53224bd2480fde Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0903070206l78e79fefl2247371c9a5a6376@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x-modular.eclass: A modified approach to EAPI support From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 300f65ae-65f7-44b6-9ca8-0f1ddc9c6dec X-Archives-Hash: f8fc3eeb2cbe0a32dcdf4f736b9c905e On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > >> Any thoughts? > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 *) >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 die "Unknown EAPI ${EAPI}" >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ;; > > Is is safe to assume that an unknown EAPI will provide a "die" > function? > If we get all Ciaran-ey about that, then we can't even assume the existence of a case statement in some future version of bash (which is required by some EAPI) --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan