From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1La5Un-0005t1-NE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:47:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BB1FE028A; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.190]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34362E028A for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so188920tid.10 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:47:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tUpLB9WV7a/0po9TzYn+fR4kXy8HGvNStn+Mn+28QwI=; b=BqkM0jN5k4u3txMNnhkHafU9CfI5rIBHanJeG6EcxTd0QkZaSj2b/sakNccvhkQKRi eP5KiA2RE8ujEEPG2mC0lFtJWxUE67rHrTD5ZDrgEuRjcauz3rJxzXgOm5k/p1jpnexe 8r/AeOsH30taODY12tGknS/c4swS3WOIJPn08= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=snnQE4JS/3aQlQr3knLX+2CItPZwwks7eVqlLUFFQRx6k8FfcoDUHXNj686DkW1Tyz bpSV4nqUeRVXKYNXxd8dfRWf2FelL5EIotC5RzySzu0OO7Gef0ulv4s5o9YiqMGpA73Y +Mk2uQaZSBKsZJUg7lOcdDAFz9dHRrw/fQi0M= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.43.18 with SMTP id q18mr4815090tiq.21.1235036821858; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:47:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <18845.10309.207236.485876@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20090213213017.GA3452@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net> <9d2010770902180007w4b2e8742y25af752e042abdd0@mail.gmail.com> <20090218090803.TAf7b2c.tv@veller.net> <9d2010770902180022yaf1d202xa75541eec7299b81@mail.gmail.com> <1235034692.23302.14.camel@localhost> <18845.10309.207236.485876@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:01 +0530 Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0902190147gf995cfar8a0ba27f99f4117c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 628ec665-8cca-4f86-bf6d-67938a724386 X-Archives-Hash: 05ec4051481049b19bcdae6c96fdf8f9 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tiziano M=FCller wrote: > This will not work. dodoc operates only on files, not on directories. > Tiziano mentioned that later in the email. Perhaps you missed it? He proposed allowing dodoc to apply on directories as well. > Besides, what do we win by this unnecessary copying? > What copying? --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan