From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-31467-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1K76QU-0001NB-3y
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:34 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CD72E0767;
	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.185])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE610E0767
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so1234770tia.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=QNHPMIrXadeoiUr20a86njnIllnTFwzRzE8IuTSDBzU=;
        b=WJC/PmOcmFwGZXqXYDowN11UCkjJfYAnTJhT3KTpHXHtFoZikjAhqZI2UeDBxPNNyA
         cEbYPFNoAmr9Ni+t3kdUgxyGn+wUI5nMzC/ex5G4ZPZOHUvOVj+cHtXP3Y8pTQl/2RXg
         Xk4tvJJgtFImMBCwHZvc4krRuoG2iaRBGhSVE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=oXASAhvPf/1rFRWjDsjc4cQNj+Le7BvYAklbrv0LAEMDqCpviqji7GQSCQVnBTMuQp
         HhVKw3QVID4ZPHTmNfN1GC/uafyZpfRwNED1kVguMs0dfOE3kC1lrJDjPfnqklH+OtXV
         qE1WS3gVj1QmfUvii5pqp3eq14i7c2svskMOc=
Received: by 10.110.15.19 with SMTP id 19mr1561686tio.42.1213352550516;
        Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.110.33.4 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0806130322s560c4fb7u70cd03964108723c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:52:30 +0530
From: "Nirbheek Chauhan" <nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
In-Reply-To: <20080613111440.5af5414e@googlemail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org>
	 <75f3dce80806121813y5d417574kb7283c285e296562@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c1c082b90806122100n320ab622me800d5a3ec271fc0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080613062612.46931b33@googlemail.com>
	 <4852375F.7010201@dev.gentooexperimental.org>
	 <7DB0FAE7-6F92-43D5-BB33-0048403A0281@gentoo.org>
	 <48523AEF.2020608@dev.gentooexperimental.org>
	 <20080613102240.4ba5d144@googlemail.com>
	 <8b4c83ad0806130310y71e62485u48baa828e09c4450@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080613111440.5af5414e@googlemail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 7502ee4a-03b7-4286-98a9-1531c34e2444
X-Archives-Hash: 39459270b51284176f152fae1adea0ce

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> But some EAPI-0 accepting Portage versions don't accept inline
> comments. Using inline comments in the tree will break those Portage
> versions.
>
> This one's especially an issue when you consider how long it's been
> since Gentoo has released official stage tarballs...

Which versions exactly? How old?

>
>> Interesting to note, however, that Paludis doesn't accept inline
>> comments, and this behaviour predates PMS.
>
> Paludis behaviour there matches Portage behaviour at the time it was
> written, except that instead of proceeding with garbage values, Paludis
> gives an error.

Well, then it should be updated to match current Portage behaviour.
PMS is not supposed to document "How portage worked at one point of
time" or "The intersection of the capabilities of Portage and
Paludis". It should follow the current portage's behaviour as closely
as possible.


-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list