From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K76QU-0001NB-3y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CD72E0767; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.185]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE610E0767 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so1234770tia.10 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=QNHPMIrXadeoiUr20a86njnIllnTFwzRzE8IuTSDBzU=; b=WJC/PmOcmFwGZXqXYDowN11UCkjJfYAnTJhT3KTpHXHtFoZikjAhqZI2UeDBxPNNyA cEbYPFNoAmr9Ni+t3kdUgxyGn+wUI5nMzC/ex5G4ZPZOHUvOVj+cHtXP3Y8pTQl/2RXg Xk4tvJJgtFImMBCwHZvc4krRuoG2iaRBGhSVE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=oXASAhvPf/1rFRWjDsjc4cQNj+Le7BvYAklbrv0LAEMDqCpviqji7GQSCQVnBTMuQp HhVKw3QVID4ZPHTmNfN1GC/uafyZpfRwNED1kVguMs0dfOE3kC1lrJDjPfnqklH+OtXV qE1WS3gVj1QmfUvii5pqp3eq14i7c2svskMOc= Received: by 10.110.15.19 with SMTP id 19mr1561686tio.42.1213352550516; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.33.4 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0806130322s560c4fb7u70cd03964108723c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:52:30 +0530 From: "Nirbheek Chauhan" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] In-Reply-To: <20080613111440.5af5414e@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <75f3dce80806121813y5d417574kb7283c285e296562@mail.gmail.com> <20080613062612.46931b33@googlemail.com> <4852375F.7010201@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <7DB0FAE7-6F92-43D5-BB33-0048403A0281@gentoo.org> <48523AEF.2020608@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <20080613102240.4ba5d144@googlemail.com> <8b4c83ad0806130310y71e62485u48baa828e09c4450@mail.gmail.com> <20080613111440.5af5414e@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 7502ee4a-03b7-4286-98a9-1531c34e2444 X-Archives-Hash: 39459270b51284176f152fae1adea0ce On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > But some EAPI-0 accepting Portage versions don't accept inline > comments. Using inline comments in the tree will break those Portage > versions. > > This one's especially an issue when you consider how long it's been > since Gentoo has released official stage tarballs... Which versions exactly? How old? > >> Interesting to note, however, that Paludis doesn't accept inline >> comments, and this behaviour predates PMS. > > Paludis behaviour there matches Portage behaviour at the time it was > written, except that instead of proceeding with garbage values, Paludis > gives an error. Well, then it should be updated to match current Portage behaviour. PMS is not supposed to document "How portage worked at one point of time" or "The intersection of the capabilities of Portage and Paludis". It should follow the current portage's behaviour as closely as possible. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list