From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmaDo-0006LL-JQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:56:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD2A9E075C; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E1E075C for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so217709wra.1 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:55:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YuC9xjB/1EnEtDBoWIX1KY3xiBT+9c/uvzWhtuj4oAs=; b=XSYd/XHK/NK07SSNKW7MyMcbCgP0Wb2lljNXVbbW44P+O9i2BhcahDKfBmEd2hAbntt7uMtdjJ7y/MiIhpPxWnhbIePHPE3smmBfKWuy3hkUXtvRa1/6rycxmm3cqfr7/xcfCBKbK/OrH46DfWyiXBjdHnPoyw77aB8vcKfs5og= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=vBuzqMIQCRgCwIpdNzb2VfUfAr7cJjPDbxpWzyzVeliSSeEiwCxsZeB9AvzHw9rC6SMzNprNpE6D1R7yFagdcoRPBC4Ki+XO8vYRCGutF0yv8IrhlEYFEA86Kgaz8WGOO8IZPyoR0cVQGqGuJVfkDYMDCoxQMxXFoTZ2S8cro7Q= Received: by 10.141.115.6 with SMTP id s6mr1086853rvm.47.1208462151158; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.142.10 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0804171255m616fa45gf49171bb68ce23a6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:25:51 +0530 From: "Nirbheek Chauhan" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: PostgreSQL Status In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4807115C.6090904@gentoo.org> <20080417164003.GB31409@nibiru.local> <8b4c83ad0804170952s5728a968v60f04f30a66e3a25@mail.gmail.com> <20080417170753.GE31409@nibiru.local> <8b4c83ad0804171029v2e37bb06i98431e96dce2876c@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: c4eb1e9e-f06a-4981-8f5f-a3ab5f697bf6 X-Archives-Hash: d544d3ff3b5a1e9433ce67ad56ed9e35 On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Tiziano M=FCller wro= te: > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > I personally have no opinion about the -base and -server split, since > > I do not know enough about it. But I am firmly against the -docs split > > since the doc USE flag is for this use-case, and I see no reason why > > not to use it. > > > > Just stick a USE=3Ddoc on -base and be done with it > > Well, this I can answer: The documentation installed by postgresql-docs > consists of both server and base documentation. There's also a 'doc' > USE-flag for postgresql-base which pulls in the docs. > Besides this, the use case I wrote in one of my last messages for > postgresql-base/-server also applies to postgresql-base/-docs or > postgresql-server/-docs. > Ah, so -{base,server} have doc USE flags which pull in -docs? That crosses out that worry of mine I suppose, thanks for the answer :) --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list