From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUnjB-0000GU-Oz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:43:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F6F0E0712; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD34E0712 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b22so2213552rvf.46 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WKxxvKGU9kstTkgS56RfGeQH75dXvV7kzBBn+xmOqLM=; b=tuPuI3zlkxtcPzzWd4MMBxZHZUEfBWVuO8dON1Zi/yUsGeTsjhmavETCze13Y926p3LuBlax9GwyJQd9JN/FDPtDUv1mKAbTmdDg73Ci4jJtEC9F6X7a/ha4B5g4KGzxuucSYCcClID9RyDq4sbgCiG3Yv/yQfCHKeEHKbrUX/U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JUboS8Tv9dd2owr8GAlXkhBGygpr5oxAlIcL2Q0BHBwC5ZlOTDSJeSHepal9pwDkaw+QM3D2WfRSW2cHTe7UZ22ob85EPsuoReuQ3bzD4VT0uSsSFdCGXzZwdK6YO9WlD6Y+lIgvpJ8zsaG8DB7CG1hUmSepKM2Q/qNR1qRkF58= Received: by 10.141.198.9 with SMTP id a9mr5782650rvq.219.1204224210858; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.142.10 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0802281043n29fcdcffxd85ca3bab55b23f9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:13:30 +0530 From: "Nirbheek Chauhan" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! In-Reply-To: <20080228124943.GA11809@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080228022750.GA28306@localhost> <47C68D33.4010405@gentoo.org> <8b4c83ad0802280317u9307742s47545414d0df5ac8@mail.gmail.com> <20080228124943.GA11809@localhost> X-Archives-Salt: fb6fc851-d92c-441c-9670-c5ea46816a58 X-Archives-Hash: 6e03c86a3e427fccad73633bc2b6281f On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Shaochun Wang wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:47:08PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > Beagle 0.3.3 itself compiles just fine, but yelp and nautilus don't > > compile with beagle support (beagle USE flag) because libbeagle got > > split from Beagle in 0.3, it's API changed, and the version number got > > bumped. Work is in progress to fix yelp with the new libbeagle, but no > > such progress has been made in nautilus. > > Probably the "beagle" USE flag in nautilus and yelp has to be made to > > depend on 0.2.18 since it doesn't work with >=0.3 > > For me, everything including nautilus compiles cleanly with beagle > support, but not yelp! Yeah, nautilus compiles with the new libbeagle, but silently falls back to manual (non-beagle) search when you try searching from within nautilus. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list