On 06/11/2017 05:17 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> We can always patch the eclass at that point if that is still a big
>> concern, but I fundamentally agree with William on this, starting
>> point
>> should be fixing it upstream, so can start with a tracking bug on
>> affected packages.
> That's a complete useless waste of time, to track some ancient packages
> that don't get any upstream update anyway. The active ones have updated
> it long ago. And it'd be a joke to propose last riting for the reason
> of a file being named configure.in instead of configure.ac.
> 
> 

That determination can be made on a package-by-package basis and fixed
in ebuild if needed.

-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3