From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-16521-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GJtDU-0004CO-Pt
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:44:57 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k83EiBgF009775;
	Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:44:11 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k83Eg7G3016404
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:42:07 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so1758024wxc
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=JkjYY0pOottPXILCSS76CYP8GwPMF/Fcw634eZxRhpCPWym0N/xs4vHb5PPf4/nE2o5rqcMs4VqYvzEMnSBRk7XD6avy00/oR3bAeIin9dmHFAghk24du79PJxXPXPr0KzK6phlXnFihNPxNILSpRFUJBSTqgBf9wtZ61/AgvGc=
Received: by 10.90.52.18 with SMTP id z18mr1000249agz;
        Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.98.12 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8a0028260609030742q3e908e3du9cd25caab0379753@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:42:06 +0100
From: "Jeff Rollin" <jeff.rollin@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1
In-Reply-To: <44FAE883.8090107@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_71752_25119810.1157294526777"
References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org>
	 <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> <44F98E43.5040307@gentoo.org>
	 <b38c6f4c0609021455i72865973oe45a9abef7c9123c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44FA15D1.2020209@gentoo.org>
	 <b38c6f4c0609030716v2e6ec9e8mab4e70b41e3730bd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44FAE883.8090107@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 12da2492-186b-4345-b85e-aa95ea2dad28
X-Archives-Hash: 9b9312daa8d16fdb9ad8878c93fce3d1

------=_Part_71752_25119810.1157294526777
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
stable distro ?

Just like to make the point that if something requires a dependency in ~arch
(unstable), then it isn't/shouldn't be in arch (stable).

------=_Part_71752_25119810.1157294526777
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br>It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how<br>can it happen that there are already know bugs in the<br>stable distro ?<br><br>Just like to make the point that if something requires a dependency in ~arch (unstable), then it isn't/shouldn't be in arch (stable).
<br><br>

------=_Part_71752_25119810.1157294526777--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list