From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696181382C5 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBB53E086B; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83135E083B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <896aa63a532178e6456fb101cfe8a1fb6003eaaf.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: guru@gentoo.org, guru-devs@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:25:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre> References: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 73f9b6d8-1223-42ac-a67a-e079c88e8313 X-Archives-Hash: b9a372b063ebd341535aa7ab6a475720 On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays. > > Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement > and test the CI > > Atm it has been configured to work with master branch. > I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a first revision has > not yet been done. If you have opinions about, please let me know. > > More info at: > https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ > > The bugs will have an internal_ref as guru_ci. > One more thing: might be a good idea to consider splitting some of the 'big' trackers (like CFLAGS) between Gentoo and GURU. I think solving these bugs in GURU has lower priority than in Gentoo. -- Best regards, Michał Górny