From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3OL81eL025259 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:08:02 GMT Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so1483241rne for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DNyBld7uUITyJxSWaOnZGv0eWdIVmeBIlf7V5xZAdPtjc8AzQSVJuXQSkjs5+IPjFG0pxShqIIHolMFLYI5JBo5qgVoxhV3tUDOc5zaeK3b8PPeiigae1UwuPsphOtrTCdZRiE6UaF40T02RKu+WuyREQFQCFzcFXpgT7LSfTyA= Received: by 10.38.9.64 with SMTP id 64mr5645079rni; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.66 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8953a1db050424140859a03aed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:08:11 +0100 From: Paul Waring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable In-Reply-To: <1114376354.1790.6.camel@rivendell> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050424144444.58715f9c@snowdrop> <8953a1db05042413295a3a4621@mail.gmail.com> <1114376354.1790.6.camel@rivendell> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j3OL81eL025259 X-Archives-Salt: 62ff9e42-229c-4349-8397-334feddfd3f0 X-Archives-Hash: 85076700b70b164fcb09da1a936dec58 On 4/24/05, foser wrote: > It's not California here. You completely ignore the fact that some > people commit more than others and as such are more likely to trip over > such a rule anyway and the people who do commit a lot are usually the > same people you don't want to revoke the access from. It was only a suggestion - you could have it so that anyone who trips up iin more than X% of commits gets access revoked, or reduced, or whatever. > 1 strike, you are out. Oh I see, a user can't make one suggestion as to a policy to deal with a problem but a dev can make as many mistakes as they like which cause systems to break. Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list