From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3OKTAC0021210 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:29:11 GMT Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so1477408rne for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nFIOTFIXbE10h2JknUmHw+aHuWuzMjL74EgKY4vJ7byDvnCuzzp6NRO0scgANFT+x28hLJm5yLdytJb6h//Y6lFs/0FhV0kTAHWX721SGCo3DZZjkyYOQIOV+GcQ6joGEIhWdo2BnKGDL6Rwz3xOBrW8VGZylQ6hxnhdKv76HdY= Received: by 10.38.74.21 with SMTP id w21mr5689527rna; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.66 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8953a1db05042413295a3a4621@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:29:19 +0100 From: Paul Waring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable In-Reply-To: <20050424144444.58715f9c@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050424144444.58715f9c@snowdrop> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j3OKTAC0021210 X-Archives-Salt: abbf7dfc-90c1-4ffe-852a-efc492d9ce86 X-Archives-Hash: 49bd27241c00f39f01988444d7a514f8 On 4/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Since keywording policy seems to be being ignored again... Don't *ever* > commit new ebuild revisions straight to stable, even if you think it's a > trivial fix. There are plenty of things that could go wrong even with > simple patches -- for example, if you accidentally included some CVS Id: > lines in your patch, they'll get nuked when you do the commit. And, if > you commit straight to stable, you end up breaking arch rather than just > ~arch. Why not have a three strike rule - anyone who commits something straight to stable 3 times in a given period (say 6 months) has their CVS access revoked. Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list