From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C50138330 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89D54E0C47; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com (mail-yw0-f196.google.com [209.85.161.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E231E0B76 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f196.google.com with SMTP id t193so4143742ywc.2 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:20:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qyxojHqj5ozt1lMxue09X0fCYShzbVkBPJVf5POIQxE=; b=FbX5F0Y4IMxgjxVPnOfocOcxupF7A6n45s4LZjOtH5CFmRFDkiVd+6oeMigh/qnTrY W9Wu7QmG+VNA0D5PZQUIMG5WW+SAlYr+WCprNWPg3hhGk41SYD1nNGaRNMUnN/mzTY9n quv+GXBH66S2v+DOHE32qcVGBZ2/atISZzAiDh0mTaEmwQ+AhB1KX9+ofwksWYSNxE8r ScuyNMmDIu6z0j+nDuuRrCDG9GoOHYSw4J+Im4HwK6nbTIH9I1JQIXwYLcJhn7j6eBnk L9IMFjveS+yrNFxZ7ig16umITSwC0zwQIhjN9267gPozRIAZcqs5SRvMycEXmRbfcSAb 4fLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qyxojHqj5ozt1lMxue09X0fCYShzbVkBPJVf5POIQxE=; b=JZjuK2hRh1bQyiIhCbS7XO1knwVSab529TBySrmvL6BfcRAQWSiIh3YhcPD3pSxk/9 f0+UQ9lkWgpI3mc5xCcc8rlobf9+JTqbipu/4tSUQPVHA6S4xPq+Z9EJgpnt2yfUuqqs 31Iwf5FtNnhXuu7fuKg3hk33sHMgkKBX9PHKdo2pNSrdGxdPynRbsV1ipfTJbH3DkC1K ndzR8UbJQ2CGy8n3uMQZIZwxGCvZIQECQd0c3VBWYI9EH3kX3DSD0JaIedmYAmlsAc1a YtPHcbnt9TNbVD6nedIcVu/l01jQ+JB0MsCOqArNHwS24RVgYg/lul0Nn5zsvo7V5SIM vqOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmqOAB5OeP/02suFWiO3LfxJZktBZSnFMtEho8Dac24xmBs150ZHm0lN1spO5wPng== X-Received: by 10.13.204.19 with SMTP id o19mr10629759ywd.148.1476454802076; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.0.10] (67-8-110-87.res.bhn.net. [67.8.110.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z193sm6414100ywg.26.2016.10.14.07.20.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: the demise of grub:0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20161003215933.GA28448@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <20161004222416.GA17685@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> From: Fernando Rodriguez Message-ID: <88505cb1-b838-62f4-cad4-f862216cbe27@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:22:10 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: f6ec409c-6f69-41bf-bd0d-13590e912b43 X-Archives-Hash: 2f5299043421b5f4623b642446f27dac On 10/13/2016 10:21 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 13/10/16 10:13 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Fernando Rodriguez >> > wrote: >> >> On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> > >> > This would actually be another reason to get rid of grub-0, if it can't >> > build on one of our profiles, it will more than likely never be fixed >> > upstream because they are now focused on grub-2.x. >> >> grub-0 is 32-bit software. You could build it without multilib but >> you need >> the dependencies like any other package (and link them >> statically). And there >> are other packages on the tree that don't build on all profiles. >> >> >> USE="abi_x86_32" >> >> ? > > Yes, that's how it's supported on multilib. Note though it still > needs a multilib profile in order to have an abi_x86_32 libc; > grub-static exists to support systems where there is no abi_x86_32 > libc installed, such as those systems using the no-multilib profile. I didn't mean it's supported by gentoo but that is possible to build it without a 32-bit *system* libc. Just bundle it and link it statically like firefox does with it's deps. grub-static probably makes more sense (that's a binary package right?). I just meant that this is not a sign that the package it's broken upstream as the comment implied. -- Fernando Rodriguez