From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382F8138334 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52455E0856; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098AEE083B for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5860834D7BF; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <882242c53652bb5844fe0b315f384c9bbf5354a7.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Usefulness of HOMEPAGE=https://www.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 18:26:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <0ebb1850c54ab69714e4f5e3525e8a40c74cb519.camel@gentoo.org> <20191205042109.31400c62@katipo2.lan> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Jn1BHlpFTrzb+nSkx/Eq" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 7162751e-7e1b-472d-b729-1e10c93264fc X-Archives-Hash: 771243a25e12fdd27a0468572ecd2832 --=-Jn1BHlpFTrzb+nSkx/Eq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:24 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 12/4/19 5:21 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100 > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >=20 > > > My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something mo= re > > > specific instead. Even link to gitweb would be more helpful because = it > > > would at least be relevant to the package in question. > > I agree so much I would support the addition of a QA check for this. > >=20 > I take it you haven't checked the CI results lately? Reaction to that > probably spawned this ML thread. >=20 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html Actually, I've requested that check. However, I didn't expect that many packages to be affected. Given that it's open season on me lately, and apparently people feel offended when bugs are reported for their packages, I've decided to start by trying to make people realize the problem globally first. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-Jn1BHlpFTrzb+nSkx/Eq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl3n7FJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA53ggf+NKNBaFwD7SZ0O9FcC6bJVKylTW3t4oBNW6Rhte961+GIIx5u6DZhkd+j JUcvnS03dokx5kerqhwxifypR0Pe1AkglzLa2B+vZpcvWE5HuMHWX3C+pcMgvlt3 EniXWspv8Y2By3lNjqp78gBkdZ/vTlyscNy1G8EsnXXqmbNRQV2H9NO7ecf8BNZW 7/5mogxLefTabiLqj1ozdBS2G3WMxPqmJkTRwoN4qO4NLxXx9um/PghiAkEREgyy 9uWPQhPw2uYH2ZbaoT21u81P6U99F7yQ6BUYIoZ9u+oCY7TjoEtl2TVlS98iPBY6 L2gMIaE6gKig3eIioqD4urJFIaC/+A== =C3Ru -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Jn1BHlpFTrzb+nSkx/Eq--