From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-91456-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6861382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:13:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B9CE087E;
	Mon, 11 May 2020 16:13:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E42DE0849
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:13:25 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <88053e7bbb7e5505ce1c8f21bd06492c0fe4795d.camel@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from
 go-module.eclass
From: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:13:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0EP42XE3cBgyy9eRtWQzcHZxiy=CLsNf126Y4_G=VBQkMq3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200510211645.19097-1-williamh@gentoo.org>
	 <CAJ0EP42XE3cBgyy9eRtWQzcHZxiy=CLsNf126Y4_G=VBQkMq3g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 32cbb4b7-688c-424c-83ed-bbece000c0b6
X-Archives-Hash: 5982a4218908aa6fe15f919924639ff3

On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > All,
> > 
> > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR
> > support from
> > go-module.eclass.
> > 
> > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa
> > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
> > 
> > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if
> > they
> > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> It seems like you're being very lazy about this. At a minimum, you
> should do the following:
> 
> 1. Search for affected packages.
> 2. Contact the maintainers, possibly via bug reports.
> 3. Give them a some time to convert their packages.
> 4. Mask any packages that do not get updated.
> 

Wow, and python changing one line in its implementation details is
breaking the world, whereas there's still a ton of users of EGO_VENDOR
in the tree?