From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail.thpoon.com (unknown [24.42.106.79]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 132F9ABDBD for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 03:25:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 41298 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2002 08:25:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tea.thpoon.com) (192.168.1.2) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2002 08:25:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27645 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Apr 2002 08:25:26 -0000 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Face: 0=A/O5-+sE[Tf%X>rYr?Y5LD4,:^'jaJ!4jC&UR*ZrrK2>^`g22Qeb]!:d;}2YJ|Hq"LHdF OX`jWX|AT-WVFQ(TPhFVak)0nt$aEdlOq=1~D,:\z5QlVOrZ2(H,mKg=Xr|'VlHA="r Mail-Reply-To: agenkin-dated-1021104894.5c690e@thpoon.com Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:25:25 -0400 Message-ID: <87znzpczuy.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i686-pc-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Arcady Genkin X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.52 (Python 2.2 on Linux/i686) Subject: [gentoo-dev] ALSA 0.9.0rc1 packages committed Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: agenkin-dated-1021104894.5c690e@thpoon.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: cf65a55b-010e-4862-b2dc-d49dc0df2f79 X-Archives-Hash: 19aeb6719563df3a6329f74abcf19cee I just updated alsa-drivers, alsa-lib, alsa-utils, alsa-oss, and alsa-tools packages to the latest version (0.9.0rc1). Could you people please test them, and we should unmask the 0.9 version of alsa, since, according to alsa's web site[1]: The 0.5.x series is considered deprecated and is no longer supported by ALSA developers. One gotcha when upgrading to the new version is that portage thinks that 0.9.0.1_beta10 is newer than 0.9.0_rc1. Note that the 0.9.0.1 version was a hack to work around portage's deficiency with handling alphabetic parts in versions (it should have been 0.9.0a_beta10, but that doesn't work with portage). Now that hack has backfired on us, and anyone who wants to upgrade would have to specify the new version for alsa-lib and alsa-utils. :-( Footnotes: [1] http://www.alsa-project.org/ -- Arcady Genkin