From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F36DAC50E for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:54:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17uvZW-0006AS-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:54:22 +0200 Received: from orion.sc (02151503627-0001@[217.84.3.49]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17uvZI-2JyCa8C; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:54:08 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=fnord.sc) by orion.sc with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17uvZH-0004BS-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:54:07 +0200 Received: from moritz by fnord.sc with local (Exim 4.04) id 17uvku-0004P3-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:06:08 +0200 To: Mark Bainter Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Spam (was Re: Hey SEXY) References: <20020927001231.EB7AFA30B0@mbox1.su.se> <20020927001753.GD5668@ufies.org> <20020927021452.GB31839@firinn.org> From: Moritz Schulte Date: 27 Sep 2002 16:06:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020927021452.GB31839@firinn.org> Message-ID: <87y99nv86n.fsf@fnord.sc> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender: 02151503627-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: ee68d668-641d-4086-9a52-d9688b80d2e7 X-Archives-Hash: 255f524a58c1336593c8bdc6993565e3 Mark Bainter writes: > Hrm...choice seems clear to me. Filtering spam on a mailing list is > a bad idea. It's one thing for an individual user to decide an > acceptable level of risk for false positives, it's quite another to > choose that for an entire list. Spam does not have to be filtered out in the sense of dropping the mails. Mails, which look like spam to a filter, could be extended with an email header tag. Then all mails would still be delivered, but users are free to filter out those mails, which are tagged as spam. moritz -- moritz@duesseldorf.ccc.de - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/ GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199