From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C5E1387FD for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD21CE0A5E; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E49E0943 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (217-67-221-143.itsa.net.pl [217.67.221.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aidecoe) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E5B533FC9C; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:57:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?xbtvxYJub3dza2k=?= To: Michael Palimaka , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project In-Reply-To: References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <53937778.7020604@sporkbox.us> <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <5393B6D8.4080201@gentoo.org> <20140608135616.581807d8@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53947600.50506@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:57:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqcqbgtt.fsf@raeviah.aidecoe.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 56ce44f1-fcc5-44c0-a945-ed0cca4d1af0 X-Archives-Hash: 877b8b24ae3651877107860bd3a8cf29 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Palimaka writes: > Perhaps we could consider GitLab? +1 on that. I have deployed it recently at work and it seems to perform well. *Really* easy to use. Easy to deploy as well. It's written in Ruby, *not Java*. It's possible to have a basic integartion with external issue trackers. It also has an LDAP auth. +1 on docs. We should focus on forcing people who were involved into OpenRC to document what they know. I could do some contributions to OpenRC, but I don't have time for reverse engineering. I have developed some experimental Plytmouth plugin to OpenRC, but it was really time consuming to guess what does what... We cannot let OpenRC die. It cannot happen that systemd and upstart are the only init systems. =2D-=20 Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTlXcPAAoJEPATRTHh2/q14BMIAICr1rv+Aw2XAYm6UZ2nUEyk RWcc6XaHZWsLPJdpjKH8wbQ2nZ+GHh3znAt+T9Cc1eENpV27m8rBgVhHaQM4E+Z6 D6qObdGchFo8vGt0uuUwNVambgdVMTWCyC8FluoJhxVM8U/C6w3wr/bTWS+gxF2V 449LVEzqG0D5GrU/ET0mB5DoWihYUaJ01D/BizhizD3UKznIQobZGJedudvlCKBL 5y2B2luo4XJtQqfQ7CBwMkuouxlYUPTdZ8orjXsUjeBnSlxc2kgsxA8+6IvOQiCN 1GH/Tdg8tLW4oUhgn1Ba3i17SzkT86SzZDvtpWzYIWRSgbLzmXwTMgitffcGLNg= =jiQA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--