From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB63158451 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FB7F2BC0C8; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8ADC2BC02B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:22:01 +0000 (UTC) References: <25e92c7126ffcc566c1cb1fb671de16d706ff4fa.camel@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-debug Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 13:20:45 +0000 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: <25e92c7126ffcc566c1cb1fb671de16d706ff4fa.camel@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <87wmslnuru.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8c7194f0-36fa-45a5-8a83-1cb91c216d46 X-Archives-Hash: 1a4966c140e8d1d9266b106ba0731feb Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi, > > I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description > could be: > > Code debuggers and debugging-related tools. Sounds good. > > Potential candidates include: > > [...] dev-util/seer as well would be a good fit. > > This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB > and GDB belong to the same category. dev-util/ currently carries 428 > packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially > when we can clearly distinguish some more specific groups. > Does anything dominate dev-util post-move or is it a real mix? > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/920438