From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9276 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Apr 2003 12:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31756 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 12:26:12 -0000 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org From: Matthew Kennedy Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 06:25:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87he9hqhh5.fsf@peti.cryp.to> (Peter Simons's message of "02 Apr 2003 13:14:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87u1dhaxxe.fsf@killr.ath.cx> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) References: <87he9hqhh5.fsf@peti.cryp.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Haskell support in Gentoo X-Archives-Salt: f7102382-70a7-444f-bcb3-148dc2635f2b X-Archives-Hash: a78274566f8710d708b56688de0ced9b Peter Simons writes: > We are moving the discussion from > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10155 > > to this forum in the hope of getting some feedback from the general > Gentoo crowd. The problems we're facing are not so much > Haskell-specific, but center around the problem of how to support > Haskell in the Gentoo framework. This is also the situation with the Lisp and Scheme compilers. It was also the case for Emacs and XEmacs (if you think of them both as interpreters). In the case of Emacs and XEmacs, we thought it would be better to provide two distinct categories: app-emacs/ and app-xemacs/. This has worked out well IMO. Matt -- Matthew Kennedy Gentoo Linux Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list