From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24828 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Nov 2003 16:40:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12432 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 16:40:30 -0000 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200311211050.59578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> <8765hdu4zg.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <20031121183551.GE2221@gentoo.org> <87ptfk7uhu.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <20031122073331.GA1974@cerberus.oppresses.us> From: Matthew Kennedy Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:36:02 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20031122073331.GA1974@cerberus.oppresses.us> (Jon Portnoy's message of "Sat, 22 Nov 2003 02:33:31 -0500") Message-ID: <87smkdk9l9.fsf@killr.ath.cx> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: ab427c0d-6ea8-4b84-a21e-4d35dd182c45 X-Archives-Hash: a34328fdd30f13c9a581cad8e79fba70 Jon Portnoy writes: [...] > > You were not suggesting making people make a single line change. You > were suggesting forcing all nonfree software out of the tree. > [...] No i think if you read properly you'll find out that I put forward what I personally believe is the best solution, and then went on to support the ACCEPT_LICENSES solution. Matt -- Matthew Kennedy Gentoo Linux Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list