From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66122-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748BE1387FD
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 12:36:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C567E091F;
	Mon,  9 Jun 2014 12:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A87E0875
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 12:36:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (217-67-221-143.itsa.net.pl [217.67.221.143])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: aidecoe)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3510340030;
	Mon,  9 Jun 2014 12:36:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?xbtvxYJub3dza2k=?= <aidecoe@gentoo.org>
To: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>, gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_kayzTLXcbih=4UHynT=ULOTq1-EUmzia=saGp1q9y=7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <53937778.7020604@sporkbox.us> <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <5393B6D8.4080201@gentoo.org> <20140608135616.581807d8@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53947600.50506@gentoo.org> <ln1vuj$oea$1@ger.gmane.org> <87wqcqbgtt.fsf@raeviah.aidecoe.name> <CAGfcS_kayzTLXcbih=4UHynT=ULOTq1-EUmzia=saGp1q9y=7g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:36:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87sineb6pz.fsf@raeviah.aidecoe.name>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 567fedeb-0822-43d0-9f78-e08aaa0aeab7
X-Archives-Hash: dae04773226e5e135435df6cb0d89b86

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> writes:

> Uh, you can't force anybody to do anything, and most of them are no
> longer around.  You can always encourage or ask nicely.

Yes, I meant that: forcing by asking nicely. :-)


> You can also set a policy of no further commits accepted without
> accompanying documentation, but that could just as easily result in
> fewer commits and not more documentation.

Yup, that's right, unfortunately.


=2D-=20
Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTlao4AAoJEPATRTHh2/q1YaQH/RfWef1A+lxIFo61kiwydX0u
Nw1AF5DY5j9IVvGPoFNd8ofsbpXuVMuUkd8j5dMBz5VF6Iv7JgJ0GzRai73XwF4e
ucya2qrC5pV7gDb5qLqxBjwKzBhA5i7Doyql19VjKYRHh++PuvWCg2dyQx2rNnev
xKq1HpqtwSrR1Dir7i+npkRnxKQp1ILGfJR85n4gUnPbP6LIxB+/AtfT9uTZcmcJ
vCZxZ9sE4b2N+ELfR5jA+Px7PPWeqPGpsIYo6omK2Akqw5YGUPhoz2CVb8tN1Do3
1RAUhJqA5KCQQofeYyuKEzKgkI2sk9HM8eKMyWGz2uNGubh393mnPpvJk39rkhI=
=6KZf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--