[gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[Mikael Hallendal]

Hi!

I just commited my changes with using pmake instead of make when make
-j 4 works. Also I added a comment when it didn't.

If you have problems building because of the use of pmake please
notify me or anyone else so that can be fixed.

I've tested on a dual PII 450MHz with 512 MB ram.

Regards,
Mikael Hallendal

The packages involved are:

PACKAGE:                   CHANGE:
dev-libs/glib              (pmake)
x11-libs/gtk+              (pmake)

# GNOME Apps
gnome-apps/bug-buddy       (pmake)
gnome-apps/ee              (pmake)
gnome-apps/evolution       ()
gnome-apps/gdm             (pmake)
gnome-apps/gedit           (pmake)
gnome-apps/ggv             (pmake)
gnome-apps/glade           (pmake)
gnome-apps/gnapster        (pmake)
gnome-apps/gnofin          (pmake)
gnome-apps/gnome-audio     (no nead)
gnome-apps/gnome-games     (pmake)
gnome-apps/gnome-media     (doesn't compile at all, look into this)
gnome-apps/gnome-utils     (pmake)
gnome-apps/gnorpm          (added comment)
gnome-apps/gnucash         (added comment)
gnome-apps/gphoto          (pmake)
gnome-apps/gqview          (pmake)
gnome-apps/gtkdiff         (pmake)
gnome-apps/gtktalog        (pmake)
gnome-apps/gtop            (pmake)
gnome-apps/gupsc           (pmake)
gnome-apps/nautilus        (pmake)
gnome-apps/pan             (added comment)
gnome-apps/powershell      (pmake)
gnome-apps/seahorse        (pmake)
gnome-apps/users-guide     (pmake)

# GNOME Base
gnome-base/ORBit           (added comment)
gnome-base/bonobo          (pmake)
gnome-base/control-center  (pmake)
gnome-base/gal             (added comment)
gnome-base/gconf           (added comment)
gnome-base/gdk-pixbuf      (pmake)
gnome-base/glibwww         (pmake)
gnome-base/gnome-applets   (pmake)
gnome-base/gnome-core      (pmake)
gnome-base/gnome-libs      (pmake)
gnome-base/gnome-print     (pmake)
gnome-base/gnome-vfs       (pmake)
gnome-base/gtkhtml         (pmake)
gnome-base/libghttp        (pmake)
gnome-base/libglade        (pmake) (add --disable-gnomedb)
gnome-base/libgtop         (pmake)
gnome-base/libunicode      (pmake)
gnome-base/libxml          (added comment)
gnome-base/mc              (added comment)
gnome-base/oaf             (pmake)
gnome-base/scrollkeeper    (pmake)

# GNOME Libs
gnome-libs/ammonite        (pmake)
gnome-libs/eel             (added comment)
gnome-libs/gb              (pmake)
gnome-libs/libgda          (added comment)
gnome-libs/libole2         (pmake)
gnome-libs/librsvg         (pmake)
gnome-libs/libxml2         (pmake)
gnome-libs/libxslt         (added comment)
gnome-libs/medusa          (pmake)

# GNOME Office
gnome-office/abiword       (added comment)
gnome-office/dia           (pmake)
gnome-office/eog           (pmake)
gnome-office/gnome-db      (pmake)
gnome-office/gnome-pim     (pmake)
gnome-office/gnumeric      (pmake)
gnome-office/guppi         (added comment)
gnome-office/mrproject     (pmake)
gnome-office/sodipodi      (pmake)

# Other
media-sound/esound         (pmake)
media-gfx/imagemagick      (pmake)
app-crypt/gnupg            (pmake)

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[AJ Lewis]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1661 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> I just commited my changes with using pmake instead of make when make
> -j 4 works. Also I added a comment when it didn't.
> 
> If you have problems building because of the use of pmake please
> notify me or anyone else so that can be fixed.

Suggestion: make a new USE variable called 'pmake' or something, and check
it in these ebuild files.  If it's not defined, use regular make.  Some
people might not have pmake installed, or they may not want to use it.  If
you absolutely cannot bring yourself to do that, at least put pmake in
the DEPENDS line, please!

Regards,
-- 
AJ Lewis
Sistina Software Inc.                  Voice:  612-638-0500
1313 5th St SE, Suite 111              Fax:    612-638-0500
Minneapolis, MN 55414                  E-Mail: lewis@sistina.com
http://www.sistina.com

Current GPG fingerprint = 3B5F 6011 5216 76A5 2F6B  52A0 941E 1261 0029 2648
Get my key at: http://www.sistina.com/~lewis/gpgkey
 (Unfortunately, the PKS-type keyservers do not work with multiple sub-keys)

-----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote----------------------------------------
THE LESSER-KNOWN PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES #16:
C- This language was named for the grade received by its creator when he
submitted it as a class project in a graduate programming class.  C- is
best described as a "low-level" programming language.  In fact, the
language generally requires more C- statements than machine-code statements
to execute a given task.  In this respect, it is very similar to COBOL.
-----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[Daniel Robbins]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:41:04PM -0500, AJ Lewis wrote:

> Suggestion: make a new USE variable called 'pmake' or something, and check
> it in these ebuild files.  If it's not defined, use regular make.  Some
> people might not have pmake installed, or they may not want to use it.  If
> you absolutely cannot bring yourself to do that, at least put pmake in
> the DEPENDS line, please!

pmake is not a program; it is a one-line script that calls GNU make with
special options that enable parallel building. :)

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@gentoo.org>
President/CEO					http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.			

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[tadpol]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:41:31PM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:41:04PM -0500, AJ Lewis wrote:
> 
> > Suggestion: make a new USE variable called 'pmake' or something, and check
> > it in these ebuild files.  If it's not defined, use regular make.  Some
> > people might not have pmake installed, or they may not want to use it.  If
> > you absolutely cannot bring yourself to do that, at least put pmake in
> > the DEPENDS line, please!
> 
> pmake is not a program; it is a one-line script that calls GNU make with
> special options that enable parallel building. :)

actually, it is a program.  Atleast three of them.

PMAKE - A Parallel MPI Version of GNU Make.
  http://www.llnl.gov/sccd/lc/DEG/pmake/pmake.html

The parallel make(1) program from the Sprite project
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/devel/pmake/pkg-descr

pmake - a perl 'make' replacement
  http://www.engelschall.com/ar/perldoc/pages/util/pmake.html

diffenently more.
  http://www.google.com/search?q=pmake&sourceid=opera&num=50


bit of digging, I see that it is part of portage.  Hmmm.  Maybe it needs to
be added to the man pages?


Hmmm. this probably is coming off much harsher than I intened.  I don't
mean it to be.  I'm sleepy. I shouldn't be online anymore.... I posted this
anyways.

-- 
Michael Tilstra                       tadpol@tadpol.org
Good leaders being scarce, following yourself is allowed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[Mikael Hallendal]

tadpol@tadpol.org writes:

Hi!

Perhaps we should use a different name for the script (the one-liner)
like emake (since all other portage-programs seems to be named
efoobar) so that there is no confusion in the future?.

If it was non-parallel building that AJ Lewis wanted just set
MAKEOPTS="" in /etc/make.conf.

Regards,
Mikael Hallendal

> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:41:31PM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:41:04PM -0500, AJ Lewis wrote:
> > 
> > > Suggestion: make a new USE variable called 'pmake' or something,
> > >and check it in these ebuild files.  If it's not defined, use
> > >regular make.  Some people might not have pmake installed, or they
> > >may not want to use it.  If you absolutely cannot bring yourself to
> > >do that, at least put pmake in the DEPENDS line, please!
> >  pmake is not a program; it is a one-line script that calls GNU make
> >with special options that enable parallel building. :)
> 
> actually, it is a program.  Atleast three of them.
> 
> PMAKE - A Parallel MPI Version of GNU Make.
>   http://www.llnl.gov/sccd/lc/DEG/pmake/pmake.html
> 
> The parallel make(1) program from the Sprite project
>   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/devel/pmake/pkg-descr
> 
> pmake - a perl 'make' replacement
>   http://www.engelschall.com/ar/perldoc/pages/util/pmake.html
> 
> diffenently more.
>   http://www.google.com/search?q=pmake&sourceid=opera&num=50
> 
> 
> bit of digging, I see that it is part of portage.  Hmmm.  Maybe it
> needs to be added to the man pages?
> 
> 
> Hmmm. this probably is coming off much harsher than I intened.  I
> don't mean it to be.  I'm sleepy. I shouldn't be online anymore.... I
> posted this anyways.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Tilstra                       tadpol@tadpol.org
> Good leaders being scarce, following yourself is allowed.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[Daniel Robbins]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:12:55AM +0000, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> tadpol@tadpol.org writes:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Perhaps we should use a different name for the script (the one-liner)
> like emake (since all other portage-programs seems to be named
> efoobar) so that there is no confusion in the future?.

Based on overuse of the name "pmake", this would seem like a good idea.

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@gentoo.org>
President/CEO					http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.			

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[AJ Lewis]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1285 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:37:35AM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:12:55AM +0000, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> > tadpol@tadpol.org writes:
> > Perhaps we should use a different name for the script (the one-liner)
> > like emake (since all other portage-programs seems to be named
> > efoobar) so that there is no confusion in the future?.
> 
> Based on overuse of the name "pmake", this would seem like a good idea.

Sorry for the flaming e-mail...I didn't mean it to come off as harsh as it
did.  Making the name of the script 'emake' instead is probably a good idea
to avoid confusion.

Regards,
-- 
AJ Lewis
Sistina Software Inc.                  Voice:  612-638-0500
1313 5th St SE, Suite 111              Fax:    612-638-0500
Minneapolis, MN 55414                  E-Mail: lewis@sistina.com
http://www.sistina.com

Current GPG fingerprint = 3B5F 6011 5216 76A5 2F6B  52A0 941E 1261 0029 2648
Get my key at: http://www.sistina.com/~lewis/gpgkey
 (Unfortunately, the PKS-type keyservers do not work with multiple sub-keys)

-----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote----------------------------------------
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
-----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] updated all ebulids in gnome-* and a couple mores

[tadpol]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:12:55AM +0000, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> Perhaps we should use a different name for the script (the one-liner)
> like emake (since all other portage-programs seems to be named
> efoobar) so that there is no confusion in the future?.

This sounds like a wonderful idea.  a quick search on emake should a couple
of hits, but nothing that seems related to make.

-- 
Michael Tilstra                       tadpol@tadpol.org
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.