From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9674C158089 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50BF62BC025; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87D12BC018 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:44:42 +0000 (UTC) References: <5e2b15e50585be2c76a1ba16f2a3517a4aa2f167.camel@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: toolchain@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-util/cvise Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 06:44:07 +0000 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: <5e2b15e50585be2c76a1ba16f2a3517a4aa2f167.camel@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <87r0l0n3qh.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 10104ca4-3779-407d-aec1-fb3062b66c92 X-Archives-Hash: d03eef78951d50156b3be55a2fc2634e Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hello, > > dev-util/cvise is now looking for a new maintainer. > > It is fairly low maintenance package. It's in need of a version bump > right now, as well as testing with llvm:17 and python:3.12 (both seem to > work fine). > > The main problem with it is that it happens to hit some bugs in sys- > devel/clang[debug] that cause crashes, and I don't really have the > resources to rebuild sys-devel/clang just to test this one package. =C2=A0 > Note that these are actually upstream bugs of clang and not cvise. They > haven't been fixed for years because big tech just doesn't care that > clang sometimes crashes on random code. Adopted for toolchain@ as it's pretty essential for us. Co-maintainers very welcome. thanks, sam