From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23F61381F3 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9750AE0AAF; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2754E0A6D for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2602:4b:af3c:ae00:12bf:48ff:fe7c:5584]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teiresias) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD6BA33EAC9 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Chris Brannon To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: s/disk space/drive space References: <51F7A86B.1030603@plaimi.net> <51F7AD9D.9060600@gentoo.org> <51F7AF3F.7010804@plaimi.net> <51F7B991.7080900@plaimi.net> <51F7D053.7080802@gmail.com> <20130730220026.4bd5bfa7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:22:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130730220026.4bd5bfa7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> (Jeroen Roovers's message of "Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:00:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87ob9ioitr.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 7bc56138-db91-43c5-a7a1-a8621beac538 X-Archives-Hash: 59845b0702de06b01db3e166bdbeb4fe Jeroen Roovers writes: > Also, "drive space" would be dead wrong. A drive[1] is a device which > holds a storage medium (often a disk, as in, you know, a "disk drive"). > "Solid-state drive" is even more confusing than "solid-state disk" (and > both are common parlance). In the interest of linguistic accuracy, maybe solid state drives should be referred to as "solid state data depositories". That would overload one of my favorite acronyms. -- Chris