From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D155158089 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F21772BC086; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F3F2BC01B for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:40:12 +0000 (UTC) References: <9903cff52c87709b6a9a47c0bc9e2509ad401ef2.camel@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.6; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for a Universal Remote-ID File Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:39:32 +0100 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: <9903cff52c87709b6a9a47c0bc9e2509ad401ef2.camel@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <87o7ht0x86.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: ea4e9938-7c34-4611-829e-a519ea64fe25 X-Archives-Hash: b134f0e2329f1e9c9961fc14d345b220 Michael Orlitzky writes: > On Sat, 2023-09-23 at 00:10 +0530, Siddhanth Rathod wrote: >> >> By establishing a universal remote-ID file, we can streamline this >> process. Your thoughts and feedback on this proposal would be greatly >> appreciated.Also, Any preferences on format? > > Building the wiki page isn't too hard, but what's the plan to propagate > changes into those seven other repositories? If we're still > copy/pasting the output of some tool, then we haven't really saved a > step, we've only changed what we're copy/pasting. At the moment, we bundle the DTD in pkgcore. If we just shoved it in metadata/ instead in the main repo, we don't have that kind of problem.