From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B7F15852A for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E3602BC041; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0CDD2BC038 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:06:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James To: Joonas Niilola Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling installed tests In-Reply-To: (Joonas Niilola's message of "Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:02:10 +0300") Organization: Gentoo References: <87ttftr9ay.fsf@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:06:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87msl98xbt.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 1e1e4b03-64d6-4dcd-aa99-794c69f6a1fc X-Archives-Hash: dd8567ffc58aed09ea46956adcc1a312 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joonas Niilola writes: > Hey, > > On 9.8.2024 18.43, Sam James wrote: >>=20 >> I'd like to pick some name which is suitable for us to use elsewhere and >> it's not really a package-specific issue. Thoughts? >>=20 > > the first simple thought that came to my mind: "install-tests" or > "install-test-files". Both are available and should be pretty > self-explanatory. Thoughts on prefix/suffix? "test-install", "test-install-files" are more in-keeping with USE=3Dtest, USE=3Dtest-full, etc, but maybe that's *bad* because it's not related at all to what the ebuild does, so we should do install-* like you've suggested? It's been in the back of my head so wanted to bring it up before committing to install-*. I think it's the better option indeed but want to check. > > -- juippis thanks, sam --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZsJGR18UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZB/UAD+KqsW0hEmFdWsRNfm3Z1Ca5ySaJIVXDuBdNVP nSp8kPUBAPoHUO3wYvn61vl7TkHJbXD4BK0tK6Z6LMb0aXa/a9UG =/VLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--