From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B898158086 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64A2AE090E; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745B7E08EB for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EAD112F47AB7; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:51:56 -0400 (EDT) References: <2f3e558beab963b3c7d80d69dc94d4a0f6fad14e.camel@gentoo.org> <3295e14fe8dd5ffa2bab5111533be8aa2890e1fe.camel@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.1; emacs 27.2 From: "Aaron W. Swenson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Common Lisp project is empty Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 09:48:35 -0400 In-reply-to: <3295e14fe8dd5ffa2bab5111533be8aa2890e1fe.camel@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <87lf24t4eb.fsf@gengoff> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2d20a20c-6059-4e43-836e-5e6f53fd5521 X-Archives-Hash: d4809e41101572a3b6a595cbbdd438a0 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Orlitzky writes: > On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 16:25 +0100, Max Zettlmei=C3=9Fl wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 14:15, Michael Orlitzky =20 >> wrote: >> > If no one intends to join, we should drop the following to=20 >> > maintainer- >> > needed: >>=20 >> I use some of those packets daily. Is there a way to join the=20 >> Common >> Lisp project without currently having maintainer status or is=20 >> that not >> intended? > > I don't think you can join the project, but you could still be=20 > added as > an additional proxy maintainer for those packages you care=20 > about. That > would let you take care of them using pull requests once=20 > everyone is > made aware that common-lisp@ isn't going to respond to RFCs. At the risk of over-committing myself (I'm stretched a bit thin=20 myself), I'm willing to be in the Common Lisp project as long as Max does=20 the heavy lifting. I've recently taken interest in getting Nyxt in tree and it=20 depends on SBCL and a few other in-tree Lisp packages. However,=20 I'm not strong on Lisp environment, and will gladly yield to=20 anyone better suited. WKR, Aaron --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOwEARYKAJQWIQQEC6Ot+QKFRWIXfOT/l1wNKJSl0QUCYYPlfF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MDQw QkEzQURGOTAyODU0NTYyMTc3Q0U0RkY5NzVDMEQyODk0QTVEMRYcdGl0YW5vZm9s ZEBnZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEP+XXA0olKXRxoABAMbMsd1wiRm+Z7RHcMEonu4G/bXg rKMqMkr4EtzHKcmzAP0R8esmIBFjJmbsfM6XwJXKh9FaunpEOTSrbPdcHo02Bw== =asx1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--