From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-101077-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEE315838C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2591E29CD;
	Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:15:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB0EE29C7
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:15:52 +0000 (UTC)
References: <871qa6j9aq.fsf@gentoo.org>
 <010f018d431c169d-00a31129-45b2-41dd-9e1c-f5fd6d64c61a-000000@us-east-2.amazonses.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.0.50
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Pseudo up-for-grabs: dev-lang/rust,
 dev-lang/rust-bin, virtual/rust
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:15:11 +0000
Organization: Gentoo
In-reply-to: <010f018d431c169d-00a31129-45b2-41dd-9e1c-f5fd6d64c61a-000000@us-east-2.amazonses.com>
Message-ID: <87frykihfh.fsf@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Archives-Salt: 4a120de2-c04b-4038-9433-6927fe7c0328
X-Archives-Hash: 8bbd505e2e233e3168f7dd595e1ff4b7


Randy Barlow <randy@electronsweatshop.com> writes:

> On 1/24/24 23:56, Sam James wrote:
>> Please consider stepping forward if you rely on Rust. There's more
>> than enough advocates for it, there should be someone who is able
>> to then handle the packaging side.
>
> Is this something I could do as a proxy maintainer?

Yes, no problem with that -- but would say that having a co-maintainer
(proxied or not) would still be good if you can.