From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,DMARC_NONE, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se ([194.236.131.211] helo=fry) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15SEH9-0004Sw-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 02:56:15 -0600 Received: from fry (fry [127.0.0.1]) by fry (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C83E898B7 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:54:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-sources-vanilla ebuilds References: <01080122044204.00608@localhost> <01080122290706.00608@localhost> <20010801134406.E27021@cvs.gentoo.org> <01080122494008.00608@localhost> Organization: CodeFactory AB In-Reply-To: <01080122494008.00608@localhost> Message-ID: <87elqu96zv.fsf@codefactory.se> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.103 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Aug 2 02:57:02 2001 X-Original-Date: 02 Aug 2001 10:54:44 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: e72be342-a784-4327-b01c-9945ba8491cf X-Archives-Hash: 209f242315f3002be3c003ad00fae7b2 Dan Armak writes: > > Well, normally, I'd say "patch linux-sources-vanilla so the kernel > >name is linux-vanilla-x.y.z". But this goes against the no-patch > >concept of the vanilla sources. Therefore, we should patch our > >already-patched kernels so they show up as linux-gentoo-x.y.z. > >Please place all your work in the package.mask for the time being, > >since they will conflict with our patched kernel. I'll get our > >official kernel patched before 1.0_rc6 is released; add a wiki item > >for the system team to remind me. Hi! Yepp, I also think that it's better to rename our modified kernel to be named linux-gentoo-x.y.z and leave the vanilla one unmodified. Regards, Mikael Hallendal -- Mikael Hallendal                micke@codefactory.se CodeFactory AB                  http://www.codefactory.se/ Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05     Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918