[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Michal Privoznik]

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
---
 app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest           |  1 +
 .../libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild    | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild

diff --git a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
index ea3d956712a..b7eb38bce37 100644
--- a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
+++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.2.tar.gz 152790 BLAKE2B b2e5eee2d67283112556c52921b14029a90d5cedf0c4575e056475191470a4b6bf5d837f1ca942b848f6509da4aa12daa508bbfc5272e1435e73fbfc290e1967 SHA512 13a522c765d278d3b8f8ab9f32f97c8531f6d131afcb0ce62ae397631db92ed3b585ad221a1f2b3bc17907cc4d61adca4a2071b0458a05f2bff5ca06191e1478
 DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.3.tar.gz 161186 BLAKE2B 1b43e7e81a43d4e969e2e30d7d62776743b3c5fb19929fb1606850946c665ad1ca662bee88743f60f202cd92fc42be1cc2cc94e99bf1d137df61bec09850de93 SHA512 6ffda3594ddc513e05e31e7d347a12e371dca3cc698ca790a70e2d01b2ceac6acb5dd6e3cd19723817b41aa62e0c0a49c01c47cb9ce379ac491856a7e88e5a08
+DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.tar.gz 157859 BLAKE2B e2c8fcdd97ba9b55bd4d318c63f7738024c1360ee10aa4e685c2ea6ca02478206febff30f3e1a82eb1a2dadaa52a377cfbce538e12e33f4ea2fe10b1a089945d SHA512 dbf47e7983f9bd6fcff205fffd1f6006268cca774cf427d39dec84dc7de37b545c0dfcbb2c6f171f55d73487cdec13341097137e24de2dea58ce90494d281162
diff --git a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f0eb657001f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2018 Gentoo Foundation
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+
+EAPI=7
+
+inherit eutils
+
+DESCRIPTION="Provides SNMP functionality for libvirt"
+HOMEPAGE="http://libvirt.org"
+SRC_URI="http://www.libvirt.org/sources/snmp/${P}.tar.gz"
+
+LICENSE="GPL-2"
+SLOT="0"
+KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
+IUSE=""
+
+DEPEND=""
+RDEPEND="${DEPEND}
+	app-emulation/libvirt
+	net-analyzer/net-snmp"
+BDEPEND="
+	virtual/pkgconfig"
+
+src_install() {
+	default
+	newinitd "${FILESDIR}/libvirt-snmp.initd-r1" "${PN}"
+	newconfd "${FILESDIR}/libvirt-snmp.confd" "${PN}"
+}
+
+pkg_postinst() {
+	elog "This daemon runs as an AgentX sub-daemon for snmpd. You should therefore"
+	elog "enable the AgentX functionality in snmpd by specifying the following"
+	elog "in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf:"
+	elog "  master agentx"
+	elog "It is further recommended to send traps to the localhost as well using"
+	elog "this option:"
+	elog "  trap2sink localhost"
+	elog "More information is available here:"
+	elog "  http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Libvirt-snmp"
+}
-- 
2.18.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Mikle Kolyada]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3150 bytes --]



On 25.10.2018 18:31, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
> ---
>  app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest           |  1 +
>  .../libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild    | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
>
> diff --git a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> index ea3d956712a..b7eb38bce37 100644
> --- a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> +++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>  DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.2.tar.gz 152790 BLAKE2B b2e5eee2d67283112556c52921b14029a90d5cedf0c4575e056475191470a4b6bf5d837f1ca942b848f6509da4aa12daa508bbfc5272e1435e73fbfc290e1967 SHA512 13a522c765d278d3b8f8ab9f32f97c8531f6d131afcb0ce62ae397631db92ed3b585ad221a1f2b3bc17907cc4d61adca4a2071b0458a05f2bff5ca06191e1478
>  DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.3.tar.gz 161186 BLAKE2B 1b43e7e81a43d4e969e2e30d7d62776743b3c5fb19929fb1606850946c665ad1ca662bee88743f60f202cd92fc42be1cc2cc94e99bf1d137df61bec09850de93 SHA512 6ffda3594ddc513e05e31e7d347a12e371dca3cc698ca790a70e2d01b2ceac6acb5dd6e3cd19723817b41aa62e0c0a49c01c47cb9ce379ac491856a7e88e5a08
> +DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.tar.gz 157859 BLAKE2B e2c8fcdd97ba9b55bd4d318c63f7738024c1360ee10aa4e685c2ea6ca02478206febff30f3e1a82eb1a2dadaa52a377cfbce538e12e33f4ea2fe10b1a089945d SHA512 dbf47e7983f9bd6fcff205fffd1f6006268cca774cf427d39dec84dc7de37b545c0dfcbb2c6f171f55d73487cdec13341097137e24de2dea58ce90494d281162
> diff --git a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f0eb657001f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +# Copyright 1999-2018 Gentoo Foundation
> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> +
> +EAPI=7
> +
> +inherit eutils
> +
> +DESCRIPTION="Provides SNMP functionality for libvirt"
> +HOMEPAGE="http://libvirt.org"
> +SRC_URI="http://www.libvirt.org/sources/snmp/${P}.tar.gz"
> +
> +LICENSE="GPL-2"
> +SLOT="0"
> +KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
> +IUSE=""
> +
> +DEPEND=""
> +RDEPEND="${DEPEND}
> +	app-emulation/libvirt
> +	net-analyzer/net-snmp"
> +BDEPEND="
> +	virtual/pkgconfig"
> +
> +src_install() {
> +	default
> +	newinitd "${FILESDIR}/libvirt-snmp.initd-r1" "${PN}"
> +	newconfd "${FILESDIR}/libvirt-snmp.confd" "${PN}"
> +}
> +
> +pkg_postinst() {
> +	elog "This daemon runs as an AgentX sub-daemon for snmpd. You should therefore"
> +	elog "enable the AgentX functionality in snmpd by specifying the following"
> +	elog "in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf:"
> +	elog "  master agentx"
> +	elog "It is further recommended to send traps to the localhost as well using"
> +	elog "this option:"
> +	elog "  trap2sink localhost"
> +	elog "More information is available here:"
> +	elog "  http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Libvirt-snmp"
> +}
could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing
list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Matthias Maier]

Applied, thanks!

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018, at 10:31 CDT, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote:

> --- a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> +++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>  DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.2.tar.gz 152790 BLAKE2B
> b2e5eee2d67283112556c52921b14029a90d5cedf0c4575e056475191470a4b6bf5d837f1ca942b848f6509da4aa12daa508bbfc5272e1435e73fbfc290e1967
> SHA512
> 13a522c765d278d3b8f8ab9f32f97c8531f6d131afcb0ce62ae397631db92ed3b585ad221a1f2b3bc17907cc4d61adca4a2071b0458a05f2bff5ca06191e1478
>  DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.3.tar.gz 161186 BLAKE2B
> 1b43e7e81a43d4e969e2e30d7d62776743b3c5fb19929fb1606850946c665ad1ca662bee88743f60f202cd92fc42be1cc2cc94e99bf1d137df61bec09850de93
> SHA512
> 6ffda3594ddc513e05e31e7d347a12e371dca3cc698ca790a70e2d01b2ceac6acb5dd6e3cd19723817b41aa62e0c0a49c01c47cb9ce379ac491856a7e88e5a08
> +DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.tar.gz 157859 BLAKE2B
> e2c8fcdd97ba9b55bd4d318c63f7738024c1360ee10aa4e685c2ea6ca02478206febff30f3e1a82eb1a2dadaa52a377cfbce538e12e33f4ea2fe10b1a089945d
> SHA512
> dbf47e7983f9bd6fcff205fffd1f6006268cca774cf427d39dec84dc7de37b545c0dfcbb2c6f171f55d73487cdec13341097137e24de2dea58ce90494d281162

^^^ Your diff contained superfluous line breaks
(some rogue e-mail editor configuration option?)

Best,
Matthias

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Matthias Maier]

> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing
> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches

Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Mikle Kolyada]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 299 bytes --]



On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote:
>> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing
>> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches
> Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then?
Because we have github/project alias for that purpose


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Michal Prívozník]

On 10/26/2018 06:52 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> 
> 
> On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote:
>>> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing
>>> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches
>> Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then?
> Because we have github/project alias for that purpose
> 

So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather
unfortunate.

Michal

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Michael Orlitzky]

On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> 
> So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather
> unfortunate. 

In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if
there were, it would have a <project-name>@gentoo.org alias that you
could send patches to. Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case,
best) place to put these in my opinion.

Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a
thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Michal Prívozník]

On 10/26/2018 05:42 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>>
>> So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather
>> unfortunate. 
> 
> In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if
> there were, it would have a <project-name>@gentoo.org alias that you
> could send patches to. 

Well, why don't we create something like virtualization@gentoo.org? That
would be a mailing list to discuss virtualization related topics.

Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case,
> best) place to put these in my opinion.

I don't think so. I've been attaching patches to BZ in the past and the
response time was very poor. I know everybody is working on gentoo in
their spare time and I appreciate it, but why not use something that
works for both sides? I think that if we want to attract more volunteers
we have to have a process that goes the least into their way.

> 
> Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a
> thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them.
> 

That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of
subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access.

But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches
until there's an agreement on how to do that.

Michal

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Joonas Niilola]

On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>
> That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of
> subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access.
>
> But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches
> until there's an agreement on how to do that.
>
> Michal
>

Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast.

Also, as I see, tamiko has been applying all of your (recent) patches, 
so maybe you can ask him to become your personal committer (/ proxied 
maintainer), and send patches via PM so everyone stays happy? :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Fabian Groffen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 434 bytes --]

On 27-10-2018 15:18:28 +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast.

Hrm ... given Github's not integrated with Gentoo, one can argue that
sending a patch to the ML is actually more simple/fast for developers.

I don't think sending patches to this ML targets the right audience, yet
I welcome the contribution.

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Alec Warner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM Joonas Niilola <juippis@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> >
> > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of
> > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access.
> >
> > But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches
> > until there's an agreement on how to do that.
> >
> > Michal
> >
>
> Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast.
>

I don't appreciate this type of argumentation. _everyone_ else doesn't use
Github. Some people use it.
Why doesn't Gentoo just use binary packages like _everyone_else; the answer
is because Gentoo values building from source and we
also value controlling our own destiny by running our own tooling.


>
> Also, as I see, tamiko has been applying all of your (recent) patches,
> so maybe you can ask him to become your personal committer (/ proxied
> maintainer), and send patches via PM so everyone stays happy? :)
>

I'm happy to see patches on the list; I'd rather have too much email on the
list then not enough.

-A

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1692 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[Matthias Maier]

Guys - we have resolved this off list. No need for more discussion.

Best,
Matthias

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

[William Hubbs]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 736 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 03:18:28PM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> >
> > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of
> > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access.
> >
> > But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches
> > until there's an agreement on how to do that.
> >
> > Michal
> >
> 
> Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast.

Actually, github is not our primary way of handling patches. It can't be
because our social contract requires us to use all open source tools.

It is an option that people use, yes, but we can't force people to use
it.

William


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]