public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: "Arsen Arsenović" <arsen@gentoo.org>
Cc: Filip Kobierski <fkobi@pm.me>,  gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for AI related packages
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:22:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bju3vm2t.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ldt93wps.fsf@gentoo.org>

Arsen Arsenović <arsen@gentoo.org> writes:

> Filip Kobierski <fkobi@pm.me> writes:
>
>> On Monday, March 10th, 2025 at 21:40, Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
>>> AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
>>> Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
>>
>> I really like thi idea.
>> For better or worse the field is growing and it would be nice
>> to have a separate category for it.
>>
>> In my opinion the category should begin with "sci":
>> - "sci-ai" feels the most general but buzzwordy;
>> - "sci-dl" is too specific as not AI is deep learning;
>> - "sci-ml" (machie learning) in my opinion would be the
>>   best choice as it describes the packages listed clearly.
>
> As was mentioned, sci-ml would be confusing with Meta-Language.
>
> The term "AI" has a very long and storied history, and covers the entire
> field of machine learning and then some.  I think 'sci-ai' is most
> fitting as a result (and, besides also being more fitting, it also is
> not ambiguous).

I agree. I can live with sci-ml if the consensus goes the other way, though.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-14 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-10 20:40 [gentoo-dev] New category for AI related packages Alfredo Tupone
2025-03-10 20:49 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-03-10 20:53   ` Maciej Barć
2025-03-10 22:42     ` Eli Schwartz
2025-03-10 22:59       ` Maciej Barć
2025-03-11  6:44         ` Ulrich Müller
2025-03-12 20:57         ` Eli Schwartz
2025-03-12 18:01       ` Bryan Gardiner
2025-03-10 20:56 ` Filip Kobierski
2025-03-13 13:07   ` Arsen Arsenović
2025-03-14 12:22     ` Sam James [this message]
2025-03-14 15:08       ` Gordon Pettey
2025-03-16 12:16         ` Arsen Arsenović
2025-03-16 14:52       ` Jaco Kroon
2025-03-10 22:28 ` Ionen Wolkens
2025-03-12  7:47 ` Florian Schmaus
2025-03-12 20:13   ` Alfredo Tupone
2025-03-15  9:09   ` Petr Vaněk
2025-03-15 15:29   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2025-03-16 13:13     ` Ulrich Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bju3vm2t.fsf@gentoo.org \
    --to=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=arsen@gentoo.org \
    --cc=fkobi@pm.me \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox