From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from titine.scrogneugneu.org (titine.scrogneugneu.org [62.212.109.39]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00BCAC65C for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:01:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by titine.scrogneugneu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8606C6C87; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:01:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Attribution: Jaco To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No 'real' editor in /bin ? References: <200209061556.07881.arutha@gmx.de> From: Eric Jacoboni Date: 06 Sep 2002 16:01:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200209061556.07881.arutha@gmx.de> Message-ID: <878z2ftdy5.fsf@titine.scrogneugneu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 128d3263-1553-40a1-9ca4-2330e781dcf3 X-Archives-Hash: f4ab506f6741e66fdbb86639fd9f20d1 >>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Gretencord writes: Alexander> So wouldn't it be wise to either install nano in /bin if Alexander> that's gentoo's default editor *sigh* or put vi into /bin Alexander> as you normally know that on any unix the one editor that's Alexander> always there is vi. I admit it's rather disturbing to not have vi as part of the base system. nano is perhaps ok for new Unix users but it's a mess for me. That's the first ebuild i've emerged. -- Éric Jacoboni, né il y a 1334764725 secondes