public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dealing with global /usr/bin/libtool use vs CC/CXX etc.
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <876b9e4e-b86d-f433-2e0d-f69fa0d6ab5a@uls.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff9f8505a46ea8c375f01c52afb7ebfa34f8345f.camel@gentoo.org>

Hi Michał,

On 2021/01/10 15:34, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vast majority of libtool-based programs use configure script to
> generate libtool.  However, a few non-autoconf packages also use libtool
> by calling system-installed /usr/bin/libtool.  The problem is that this
> libtool hardcodes the values of CC/CXX at its' build time, so unless it
> is rebuilt frequently, packages end up using the stale values.
> The problem is known since 2005 [1] and hasn't been resolved yet.
>
> I can think of two ways of solving it:
>
> 1. We could patch system-installed libtool to respect environment
> variables such as CC, CXX, etc.  This will probably require carrying
> a (possibly non-trivial) patch forever.  On the bright side, libtool is
> not exactly a package seeing frequent releases.  I mean, the current
> version is from 2015.
>
> 2. We could regenerate libtool and force local instance of libtool
> in the packages needing it.  The main advantage of this is that it's
> a no-brainer.  I could make a quick eclass that does configure a local
> instance and prepends it into PATH.
>
> WDYT?

3.  Have it always use some fixed compiler somewhere (ie, compile it
with CC=/usr/bin/cc-libtool-wrapper CXX=/usr/bin/cxx-libtool-wrapper
which quite literally is just scripts that does):

exec "${CC}" "$@"

and

exec "${CXX}" "$@"

(with some added logic that if those variables points to itself it needs
to do a bit of extra work, or use "${LIBTOOL_CC:-${CC}}" style and
compile libtool with LIBTOOL_CC=${CC} CC=/usr/bin/cc-libtool-wrapper ...
I'd still add logic to detect the infinite recursion of CC=$0 though ...).

Would be happy to supply a suitable script if you're interested that you
can then just symlink the variants to
(libtool-tool-wrapper-{cc,cxx,ld,ar,...})

Kind Regards,
Jaco



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-10 13:34 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dealing with global /usr/bin/libtool use vs CC/CXX etc Michał Górny
2021-01-10 13:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2021-01-10 14:47   ` Michał Górny
2021-01-10 22:49     ` Joshua Kinard
2021-01-11  8:52 ` Jaco Kroon [this message]
2021-01-11 18:36   ` Peter Stuge
2021-01-17 22:55     ` Lars Wendler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=876b9e4e-b86d-f433-2e0d-f69fa0d6ab5a@uls.co.za \
    --to=jaco@uls.co.za \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox