From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C1E158451 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE7DDE2A2A; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74641E29FF for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:02:13 +0000 (UTC) References: <25e92c7126ffcc566c1cb1fb671de16d706ff4fa.camel@gentoo.org> <6dfa4afb-7b14-42e2-a0c0-39929c1f300b@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Mart Raudsepp Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-debug Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:01:18 +0000 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: <6dfa4afb-7b14-42e2-a0c0-39929c1f300b@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <875y01o3im.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a5cb738c-cabc-4f45-afdf-844d7407d6cb X-Archives-Hash: b70609f8c3d0d97228a44ec2cdd70fd6 Florian Schmaus writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > On 07/01/2024 13.48, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> Hi, >> I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The >> description >> could be: >> Code debuggers and debugging-related tools. > > Seems sensible. I'd probably drop the "Code" from the description, > since packages like d-spy do not primarily debug code. > > I assume profilers are explicitly not part of this category? leio had the same question and we came up with a list of about 5-6 packages at least which would fit in a dev-profile category... > > - Flow >