From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9432F158041 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 12:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7508AE2A6D; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 12:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA10E2A66 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 12:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo In-Reply-To: (Duncan's message of "Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:47:57 -0000 (UTC)") Organization: Gentoo References: User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 30.0.50 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:14:59 +0100 Message-ID: <875xwy8wxo.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 07e46cb8-2af3-49e7-b046-bd6d21ea25fa X-Archives-Hash: 48a936bd4e132bd473dad2136bab3e6b Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> writes: > Eddie Chapman posted on Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:32:41 +0100 as excerpted: > >> Yes, I have no issue with the format at all, just with the xz utils >> project. > > FWIW, feel free to do that bug-fix or package-bump if you'd rather instead > of reading this long thing! I won't complain! =:^) Something's wrong - we're agreeing ;) You're spot on. Tangible real changes and efforts are useful, not "please boil the ocean". > [...] thanks, sam