From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-4492-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 13517 invoked by uid 1002); 12 Jul 2003 08:59:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 27627 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2003 08:59:06 -0000
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-URL: <http://www.better-com.de>
X-Face: "d[&>8')a)wbF:+L#^<_cohnX6#m5RCCeKF/6_gD(iQ9bX?xe2~Aq*!')D(1ks`?YhomOYbL3R:{4e4a]qft_]<.q/Lf4hIr,`G+LX33&TYp}XGf<b?+GPT;3I8k/|[DR#MO1N(h>e~^5m$28R"$C(EwnB\n8t
From: Martin Lesser <gentoo@better-com.de>
Date: 12 Jul 2003 10:54:36 +0200
Message-ID: <874r1s15wz.fsf@kirk.better-com.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Where to propose stableness
X-Archives-Salt: f2fac7a1-79cb-47a8-8cdf-6d3b35ca7c52
X-Archives-Hash: 5c11442f222238578c75a1f2ea8afa5e

What's the right way to report stableness of ebuilds?

I ran some packages (for example openldap-2.1.X) for several weeks in a
production environment which were marked with "~x86" and had no problems
but don't know where or to whom this should be reported.

Martin

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list