From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303DA138330 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 02:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6BB5E0AB0; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 02:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A19BE0A8E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 02:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x2 (unknown [133.11.143.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: heroxbd) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 731DA335C30 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 02:43:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Benda Xu To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles. References: <87incciwrn.fsf@proton.d.airelinux.org> <1923568.CsY0vfU1ob@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 11:43:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1923568.CsY0vfU1ob@localhost.localdomain> (Aaron Bauman's message of "Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:41:49 -0500") Message-ID: <874lnv21m9.fsf@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c839765a-1f75-4351-9422-1a06f301cdb8 X-Archives-Hash: 366872f29f2fd9b27208e097bae0223b --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Aaron, Aaron Bauman writes: > I am not too familair with prefix other than the purpose of it (e.g. I > have never built it), but is there a better naming standard for the > profiles? I understand the need to distinguish between the kernel and > glibc versions. > Is there a standard I am missing for profile names? From=20PMS, there is no words on profile naming. But I think adopting naming of category [A-Za-z0-9+_.-] will not be too wrong: https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-170003.1.1 > Could there be a wiki explaining a prefix profile versioning that > correlates to the glibc and kernel versions? Or is the intent to keep > it simple and easily identifiable from within the PM? A wiki page would be a good idea for detailed explanations. > Not a big deal, but just my thoughts. Thanks for your work on prefix > and I am sure many will benefit from the new profiles :) Thanks for inputs! Yours, Benda --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEENTS8ZhMowhj4Iw2H33YQtSHxcSIFAlpULE4ACgkQ33YQtSHx cSLfRRAAhMAScpqoWTAcfyrHqYfAtnjKl+z3jw84hcqOzICr32fLG8mJaJ4TX9TH CW3Nj8ATVscrJx851y9rffjwn9/gwtpah9yBTZvyQWuAlYxmUol0whG3MX3XYd+O GWRnDXXaRchPxNrAdCWuK9RwWQfjdJF490bq89ThL/YrmM4o5NluZVgj2HUG8tfX 0nlau0pHE6uVMmACPH1oc/xQZsL9Kx1yq2/gkkAi4qgc/QjP4c7cEShDT4zOWHmc aLkZdsk/c5Jm8ICukJysbaWJ3/oaz8h5zfv1gGLs/VFYhwIgPT3cdY9Xri8yjldn G8DDrtaYII0Aer6RSA1GTuE08mB4lbspC0m0H/TNoQzd6pBFz2+V6+VrF60pKgDP oc6bwOFTiEkodlB58vpXj6To7A9ZMNKjzyFM/KHF567MKlbvJXalGs270DWDGs3U e6V8r3ZGpuGiQD2kAiC/k4F4Lve++u/Z9JAz1uGw5nNBLSCiQo8Nj/hTRXTPievT BKqj1xBy7goSAwIxRccbeQ2NrjJpwVZ4nxCE39Y8CnanEBorh30yC4pbJ36gHrLf 67LTnIWud/Eb7bp8OCF9QDIQZhsN7Y3wavfv3KadFqSKnqvXWBPaV0k5PAaF3Rlf cHHfnQmd+wjYXGJ0VSpugsxdFUIQgop1eTr5QtIjVT32VQ/AfYM= =TVE8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--