Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org> writes:

> On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +0000, Sam James wrote:
>> ulm points out that estack.eclass is particularly inefficient
>> (although
>> it'll get slightly better once
>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31437
>> is fixed).
>> 
>> Let's just manually roll it like llvm.eclass does.
>
> It looks like that was the only use for inhering estack? If so that
> inherit can go too, right?

Good spot - thanks!
>
> Hans

best,
sam