From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7368 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Nov 2003 15:23:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28081 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 15:23:51 -0000 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200311211050.59578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> <200311210226.hAL2QNe4093277@mxsf04.cluster1.charter.net> <20031121031332.GB22586@time> <20031121100737.GJ1502@gentoo.org> <32878.141.166.236.158.1069410832.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> <1069412078.4883.15.camel@bengal.lan> <1069418053.9189.5.camel@rattus.localdomain> From: Matthew Kennedy Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:19:26 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1069418053.9189.5.camel@rattus.localdomain> (William Kenworthy's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:34:13 +0800") Message-ID: <871xs1u4u9.fsf@killr.ath.cx> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: 5934f93e-f9ef-4188-aa3f-347b16895ece X-Archives-Hash: 6bba8e99e3e39af3d16015e5ec8abff2 William Kenworthy writes: > as a user I'd object to that. I think that accept all is the best > default as that would seem to be the most useful and popular path. > Otherwise, you may as well install debian if you are going to force > restrictions on people out of the box. [...] Oh come on, worry about the "defaults" once its implemented. > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- Matthew Kennedy Gentoo Linux Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list