From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E0C158064 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 04:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D40DE2A3D; Fri, 3 May 2024 04:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397FBE2A32 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 04:42:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] .github: Add pull request template In-Reply-To: (Ionen Wolkens's message of "Wed, 1 May 2024 10:28:38 -0400") Organization: Gentoo References: <20240501133259.48778-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 30.0.50 Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 05:41:59 +0100 Message-ID: <871q6jld60.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: eb0dcd6b-5171-4c18-82a5-bc907bb24418 X-Archives-Hash: 9bf90d2086c4c28eb0e7611fa3e76390 Ionen Wolkens writes: > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:32:21PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> The idea is to increase awareness of the AI policy, as well as other >> rules, and to inform users before they submit a PR. > > Bit mixed feelings about this given checkboxes feel like unnecessary > churn for routine contributors and is semi-redundant with the > Signed-off-by. > > I think it's great for first-time/occasional contributors though. > > Having a AI-specific checkbox does feel kind of overkill when it won't > concern the majority of contributors, albeit given how how hard the whole > thing is pushed lately and that we have no real way to verify beside the > user being made aware of it and certifying it... > > On a side-note, I have nothing against having .github in the tree. Just > saying given I know not everyone is happy with that. Indeed, the only line for me is if we were solely relying on it, e.g. if we replaced all self-hosted CI with github actions CI or similar. I don't see supplementary files for services we make use of, but don't depend on, as a problem, as long as they're not some minor experiment.