From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27581 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Aug 2003 00:22:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32048 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2003 00:21:59 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: email: Host grizzly.ps.uni-sb.de [134.96.186.68] claimed to be ps.uni-sb.de To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <86u18xx9h4.fsf@speedy.ps.uni-sb.de> <200308042011.01044.vapier@gentoo.org> From: Denys Duchier Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:20:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200308042011.01044.vapier@gentoo.org> (Mike Frysinger's message of "Mon, 4 Aug 2003 20:10:54 -0400") Message-ID: <86n0epx8eg.fsf@speedy.ps.uni-sb.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: per package settings (proposal?) X-Archives-Salt: 33648194-68e5-4657-adc5-ec1d8daea63d X-Archives-Hash: c46385900cc6b050b637b072a9ebbd7b Mike Frysinger writes: > please review http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13616 and then pos= t again=20 > (and/or take your thoughts to the bug ... that would be prefered) thanks! I did search the bugs db, but I missed this particular entry. Cheers, --=20 Dr. Denys Duchier =C9quipe Calligramme LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list