public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] How to name xdvik-22.40y1 ebuild?
@ 2003-09-02 23:04 Mamoru KOMACHI
  2003-09-03  6:15 ` Patrick Kursawe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mamoru KOMACHI @ 2003-09-02 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Hi all,

I've just wanted to package xdvik-22.40y1 (patch release of
xdvik-22.40y).  First I named it as xdvik-22.40y_p1.ebuild:

rico% ebuild xdvik-22.40y_p1.ebuild digest
!!! Name error in 22.40y_p1: characters before _ must be numeric
!!! Error: PF is null; exiting.

Second, I tried xdvik-22.40y1.ebuild:

rico% ebuild xdvik-22.40y1.ebuild digest
!!! Name error in 22.40y1
!!! Error: PF is null; exiting.

Third, xdvik-22.40y.1.ebuild:

rico% ebuild xdvik-22.40y.1.ebuild digest
!!! Name error in 22.40y.1: "40y" is not a valid version component.
!!! Error: PF is null; exiting.

After all, I couldn't make xdvik-22.40y1 ebuild :-(

As far as I understand naming policy from Gentoo Linux documentation I
think xdvik-22.40y_p1.ebuild is valid name (pkg = xdvik, ver = 22.40y,
suf = p1) while the others are invalid, but Portage complains about
all of them.  Do I misunderstand naming policy or does it belong to
Portage bug?  How can I make an ebuild of xdvik-22.40y1?  (I can name
it xdvik-22.40y-r2.ebuild as the last resort :-/ )


regards,

-- 
Mamoru KOMACHI <usata@gentoo.org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~usata/

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] How to name xdvik-22.40y1 ebuild?
  2003-09-02 23:04 [gentoo-dev] How to name xdvik-22.40y1 ebuild? Mamoru KOMACHI
@ 2003-09-03  6:15 ` Patrick Kursawe
  2003-09-03  6:56   ` Mamoru KOMACHI
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Kursawe @ 2003-09-03  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 617 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:04:35AM +0900, Mamoru KOMACHI wrote:

> As far as I understand naming policy from Gentoo Linux documentation I
> think xdvik-22.40y_p1.ebuild is valid name (pkg = xdvik, ver = 22.40y,
> suf = p1) 

I think you are right.

> Do I misunderstand naming policy or does it belong to
> Portage bug?

File a bug and wait if it's marked as invalid :-)

> How can I make an ebuild of xdvik-22.40y1?  (I can name
> it xdvik-22.40y-r2.ebuild as the last resort :-/ )

Please don't do that. The -r? part just means versioning of the ebuild,
not of the package itself.

Bye, Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] How to name xdvik-22.40y1 ebuild?
  2003-09-03  6:15 ` Patrick Kursawe
@ 2003-09-03  6:56   ` Mamoru KOMACHI
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mamoru KOMACHI @ 2003-09-03  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

At Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:15:16 +0200,
Patrick Kursawe wrote:

> > Do I misunderstand naming policy or does it belong to
> > Portage bug?
> 
> File a bug and wait if it's marked as invalid :-)

All right, I filed a bug report ->  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27840

> > How can I make an ebuild of xdvik-22.40y1?  (I can name
> > it xdvik-22.40y-r2.ebuild as the last resort :-/ )
> 
> Please don't do that. The -r? part just means versioning of the ebuild,
> not of the package itself.

Sure, I didn't intend to do that ;-)


Thanks,

-- 
Mamoru KOMACHI <usata@gentoo.org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~usata/

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-03  6:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-02 23:04 [gentoo-dev] How to name xdvik-22.40y1 ebuild? Mamoru KOMACHI
2003-09-03  6:15 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-09-03  6:56   ` Mamoru KOMACHI

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox