From: "Arsen Arsenović" <arsen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] last rites (kinda, long masked): sys-apps/opentmpfiles
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 12:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bke1caqc.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAENw6g4wToAeWxRoEm203AtCq28P_DJYk2MrxrEvGBiQK65Bew@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1865 bytes --]
Alexe Stefan <stefanalexe48@gmail.com> writes:
> One is written in shell, the other is written in c.(no problems here)
Not that implementation language matters.
> One is not part of systemd, the other is.
Both work fine without systemd, but the systemd implementation also
happens not to be unmaintained and happens to be more complete.
> How are they identical.
The last rites message does not say that opentmpfiles and
systemd-tmpfiles are identical. That'd do a disservice to the actually
complete, unmaintained, and (currently) non-CVE-affected implementation
in systemd.
> I use this on my raspi server, works fine.
'WOMM' is a fairly terrible measure.
> Gentoo really became a systemd distro, further restricting choice by
> the day.
[ignoring this nonsensical statement, notice put here for clarity]
Gentoo devs aren't obliged to maintain software you like to use.
systemd-utils[tmpfiles] works on all Gentoo systems, including
non-systemd ones. Until that changes (which is unlikely), I doubt there
will be much interest in maintaining a fork from inside Gentoo.
Please take up opentmpfiles maintenance. You have
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/689954cc7fd55402dc4c82aa0ac70efb
to address, and probably some other issues. See
https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/19 for context.
The message above implies that a rewrite in C is necessary.
This should be rather easy. The systemd implementation is only ~4k LoC
(excluding shared code), so I imagine that a complete reimplementation
should be far less than 10k. Since this is fairly elementary stuff, it
should be possible to finish in a weekends time.
Submit a PR to re-add opentmpfiles after you're done.
Looking forward to reviewing your contributions upstream. Have a lovely
day :-)
--
Arsen Arsenović
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 381 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-17 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-16 22:47 [gentoo-dev] last rites (kinda, long masked): sys-apps/opentmpfiles Andreas K. Huettel
2023-09-17 5:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Alexe Stefan
2023-09-17 8:37 ` David Seifert
2023-09-17 8:47 ` Alexe Stefan
2023-09-17 10:58 ` Arsen Arsenović [this message]
2023-09-17 11:15 ` Arsen Arsenović
2023-09-17 13:05 ` orbea
2023-09-17 17:28 ` Alexe Stefan
2023-09-17 20:49 ` Michael Orlitzky
2023-09-17 11:53 ` Michael Orlitzky
2023-09-17 13:32 ` Marc Joliet
2023-09-17 17:10 ` Marc Joliet
2023-09-17 17:25 ` Michael Orlitzky
2023-09-17 17:53 ` orbea
2023-09-20 13:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86bke1caqc.fsf@gentoo.org \
--to=arsen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox