From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdIzP-0000Oc-3d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:02:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ31GwF013796; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:01:16 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ2xPo8021439 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:59:25 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA1DA1490C for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:59:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10518-03 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:59:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E4BA03C74 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:59:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:59:15 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <8693513.20051119035915@gentoo.org> To: Ciaran McCreesh Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain In-Reply-To: <20051119024946.6c9b76a2@snowdrop.home> References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051118173243.GA16034@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <437E4F3E.5070705@gentoo.org> <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> <437E5965.10502@gentoo.org> <20051118235829.GC12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <3610591862.20051119010748@gentoo.org> <20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <437E7C4F.8050602@gentoo.org> <20051119012522.3c4a6d63@snowdrop.home> <437E87EE.4030308@cs.ubishops.ca> <20051119020741.662eea3f@snowdrop.home> <1539050819.20051119032713@gentoo.org> <20051119024946.6c9b76a2@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------10EC324F2E4BEFA3" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[SPF_NEUTRAL=1.379] X-Spam-Score: 1.379 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: efc96e01-56d0-41eb-8eb8-27b77f41b54f X-Archives-Hash: 33a4aaa18f41cabe4dade6e9a72332f0 ------------10EC324F2E4BEFA3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A19.11.2005, 3:49:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:27:13 +0100 Jakub Moc wrote: > | 19.11.2005, 3:07:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | >> Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in | >> ChangeLogs. > |=20 > | How exactly does testing stuff fit into *changelogs*, have I missed > | something? > "Stable on $arch, thanks to $at1 and $at2 for testing and hunting down > build issues." Thanks, no... Reminds ne of the debates on forums.g.o, why emerge --changel= og feature is useless and why people file pointless bugs: too much irrelevant stuff. Testing ebuilds when keywording/marking stable is supposed to be mandatory and such stuff does not belong into changelogs. (Submitting patch= es is naturally completely different thing, but that's not what ATs do 99% of = the time they spend testing stuff). --=20 jakub ------------10EC324F2E4BEFA3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDfpUDhxfV/c66PZ4RAqMZAJoD1ZFHT9ld38/D96KZ2Fs+V9BcjwCgk1Xm FhqSDp/8vFuBFNFmWNkzuJM= =gRT/ -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------10EC324F2E4BEFA3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list