From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F282138334 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDD34E0937; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCFBE092F for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.185.116.58] (apn-37-248-212-216.dynamic.gprs.plus.pl [37.248.212.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D567734C518; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:11:51 +0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20191029093401.GB22441@gentoo.org> References: <4c7465824f1fb69924c826f6bbe3ee73afa08ec8.camel@gentoo.org> <2d15507e-98ad-9466-75b7-7e8268ef2eb9@gentoo.org> <752be6c75f337df8ee8124a804247d2fb27e73b4.camel@gentoo.org> <20191029093401.GB22441@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org,Fabian Groffen From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= Message-ID: <839D1F8E-35EE-43C9-B513-9895F087D77A@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c0a6a5fe-8060-4cd2-b0e9-88941778fc97 X-Archives-Hash: 4730e881088ffff5e1561030183b3100 Dnia October 29, 2019 9:34:01 AM UTC, Fabian Groffen = napisa=C5=82(a): >On 29-10-2019 05:27:37 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 00:24 +0100, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1= =BB=85n >wrote: >> > Hi! >> >=20 >> > > Today you get chastised for using /space/distfiles-local and not >> > > following policy changes=2E The devmanual states that it's >deprecated >> > > since at least 2011, and talks of using d=2Eg=2Eo [1]=2E >> > > [1]=20 >> > >https://devmanual=2Egentoo=2Eorg/general-concepts/mirrors/index=2Ehtml#su= itable-download-hosts >> >=20 >> > Sorry I'm late to the party, but I would like to enquire about what >happens=20 >> > if a file with existing filename but different b2sum gets uploaded >to=20 >> > /space/distfiles-local now? >>=20 >> The same as before=2E It gets put in top-level disfiles directory=2E= =20 >> Hashes are calculated from filenames, so this wouldn't affect it=2E=20 >That >> is, if it put those files in subdirectories in the first place >because >> it doesn't=2E > >/space/distfiles-local is no longer copied to the mirrors? or just not >copied in the subdir-hierarchy? The latter=2E > >> > Doing so and updating the Manifest used to be another (not >necessarily=20 >> > preferred) method to address upstream remaking release packages=2E >> >=20 >>=20 >> It's no longer valid=2E > >Just wondering=2E Do you mean it isn't valid that some upstreams do this >(yes horror)? We surely need a way to work around that =2E=2E=2E I mean the method using same filename and expecting distfiles-local to ove= rwrite it=2E It is preferable to just rename it=2E > >Thanks, >Fabian -- Best regards,=20 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny