From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-81350-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B88A9139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:16:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 538AB214162;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10EAA21415E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49] (2001-44b8-4197-2800-a37a-5ec1-db17-1e49.static.ipv6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: kensington)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70912341900
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization
References: <1897557.6sYsMVzEX5@wanheda>
 <CAGfcS_=BW4GuxvH=PM1MYA_Zgs7o0N7v-DsdW+oa5+vMVENUeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170710225725.4c85c26a4f89fe53686f2fb2@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_krTJ9GAbW7S4P4XsDiLgd9EMW98CENXPT=LBrq4jCMKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e2c8a847-f5e9-1c63-a8f5-57d890903432@gentoo.org>
 <20170711022906.39a6a2bfd78fb8e6f5f61b6f@gentoo.org>
 <0cb79760-99bd-9b95-8771-23af851e71c3@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_maVaHEuvy+owHt4FjOvhbQVwB9iTuGZNnGKBSFbEDvtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <eb836a24-1f7e-e470-e7b8-f68b4dac53dc@gentoo.org>
 <9069747f-2e1d-5573-e72d-f965deabb3c5@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <832c1060-ce64-d0d8-c78a-93c84d39cade@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:16:29 +1000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9069747f-2e1d-5573-e72d-f965deabb3c5@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 8639161b-5865-4729-9462-fdc00af31916
X-Archives-Hash: ec9fb4bff742beea8bd7d553de43e2fd

On 07/12/2017 12:13 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 03:47 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> The main risk of breakage of a package moving from testing to
>> stable is always at build time anyway.
> 
> citation needed
> 

Based on my experience doing package testing in stabilisation work. Feel
free to provide citations (or complete sentences) to the contrary.