From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfXwE-0006Te-Pp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:09:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FB56E046B; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.144]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52323E046B for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so297433qwj.10 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:09:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NPKTq1FeNVBQi+tl2iNZLvr55dr5KoSPdAFsx7104IA=; b=CqivHJI5G2dyNH7swzt4eOoCCMvhp8m/c8kkHcYlK53d68E5Cu/mLfy1322aFY2dbi 4vmtDAGs8iod9LVzYw0GyYnlqjo2+4Lzp5V+gP3ICQEUh7/pWMF7ZCd1WKK9OMVmFtHe v5VreRgLaX8JDBT4CVOy+MAZjwGDlImiQxnOo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MwIoGLLsbcpHQ8PyQPmwLiA5GHFBH1mmkBD2JODgjgvFp9Yv/eIveydNyqnPPBF7lk QdNgR+HRPbhwA9CFZw0TjVQOrNBINVhDcaqTH5FvhDIbhnK3diSCBK6L3Qu3pMibR1Re jvBDgL4FS8Rvebt6A5hM7cUQRIICkhBi9GtOs= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.109.194 with SMTP id k2mr1926643qcp.6.1236337796973; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:09:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49AFB01A.8070607@gentoo.org> References: <81bfc67a0903032332g6ab9d278q733cb514338b0bb4@mail.gmail.com> <20090304114646.0fd3758c@gentoo.org> <81bfc67a0903041517v6aa493a0oda33a297d28a40e3@mail.gmail.com> <49AFB01A.8070607@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 06:09:56 -0500 Message-ID: <81bfc67a0903060309g512f633bhfb9262390219e54@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ) From: Caleb Cushing To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 93e7d026-b515-476f-8687-febac42c92b6 X-Archives-Hash: c68ec2472ece9d9e0f2e25271946df1a > I've found that git's patches aren't really what we want in the case of b= umping. > =C2=A0For bug reports we usually ask for a patch against the last ebuild = in the tree. > Is there perhaps a way to make git do that automatically? well, git has copy detection, you can tell if a file is merely a copy of the previous (if git format-patch is done right) you can also just do a diff on it? you could probably put it in a hook. or write a script... or numerous other ways. once the work is done, getting any amount of varying diffs is easy. the problem with git right now, is all the things that gentoo does for cvs and rsync. git doesn't need as much manifesting, it doesn't need the cvs headers, or ChangeLog files, all this stuff just clutters things with git. but this is a 'right now' problem, that I'm working to solve, most of it leads right back to manifests. > It's great that people are doing their own thing, but to get it into OUR = tree it > will need to be comitted to OUR tree by someone who has access to OUR tre= e. > Patches are great, but commits are better. yes but your commit process is made more complicated by your tools. I for the most part require that the entire commit be ready to go. > Your demands because of your feelings of entitlement are what are costing= you > respect. why do people keep telling me what I feel? anyone else ever notice feelings don't convey well over text. > Yes, it's extremely frowned upon to step on another developers toes; Gent= oo is > not a one-man show. Would you like ME to stomp all over your tree? Didn't= think so. that depends on what you mean by 'stomp' if by stomp you mean fix problems for users, stomp away. if by stomp you mean break stuff, then no. I don't care if you change something I changed if it's better, it's better. > Just so we're clear. I really hope you change your attitude and take Pete= r > Alfredsen (loki_val) up on his generous offer. and my attitude is? what is it that you think I think? I may take him up. but I'm also considering the possible conflict of interest, as well as the additional time requirement. I hope you understand. even if I do I have a commitment to what I've already started. --=20 Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com