From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34728-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Lf0NZ-0003cQ-0u
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:19:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C85E00A2;
	Wed,  4 Mar 2009 23:19:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.155])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55277E00A2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  4 Mar 2009 23:19:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so2158679ywq.46
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:19:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Z+ij9cJ1uZ/8nXHmJIjpm2vkrgYr8wl5mQ3WdhfIosE=;
        b=Dk4JC5PO5KvNMvrhk/neZ0iwZEtoZmXNseBj0eP5MT0bw70KjoFTtIv2ZiGvITnhIQ
         7JBf/c0JfTAH47RRpYBnorryQTTJ3W6wD8dFnUUXKf+WUB9B5jTVKzXZiq2SQdirZmgs
         bOnTY7qfgS1qHFJHFDge5iO/eJAvFTH3Rvq1I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=fnIPjDB6kMVvYRTuiQbGWT3SrcHQ/VhYYdkAh6jQKw2tKX2flrJirs6i/cep6YEw1G
         Arw9eg0ZoI6H09FOruxCWarorlQW+s5U13uwNnA1Lz3bwGSajUIsXGgD23LMxoi0STUA
         Mvtqy2u4RsNVFMeUaTduIpSCPFrxmR3ijm3lI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.228.13 with SMTP id a13mr400069anh.90.1236208792973; Wed, 
	04 Mar 2009 15:19:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20090304135933.GA21452@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net>
References: <81bfc67a0903032332g6ab9d278q733cb514338b0bb4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090304135933.GA21452@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:19:52 -0500
Message-ID: <81bfc67a0903041519x387e99ccv7d9762772c591d4c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )
From: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: f29a4aaa-308e-4a87-aa4e-d260a6a52156
X-Archives-Hash: 833cb55d71bbb3e07168038a7f33ec2e

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@gentoo.org> wrote:
> eh, that's the problem with ~arch. ~amd64 keywords aren't added for
> every new version; keywords are carried over from the previous version.
> Having to test each new version of a package before it receiving a
> keyword puts far too much stress on the arch teams

I'm not talking about testing before... I was talking about removing
it after. I understand that not everything can always be tested
before. But when it's found to be broken, there shouldn't have been an
argument about the kewords removal in lieu of a proper fix.
-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com