From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JH82G-0002MT-HV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:34:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D31A5E08C3; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3BFE08C3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1904899fga.14 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:34:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4dD1tX13FAsvNGYadv3M0EYRgaF/KCpZE+kdH/uo5P4=; b=MKF6FC+833eWYQ0iMfElBntQADJr/qG0nXfDOeb7grxRx5qNTRkzEl5hmVgB+jaOCSkVPnqQFdh7drAs6Sx5T8vknNFq0EzLF0cZKblx7y3q3HsB0jYGpAN5C988lSfdiLoZOQ1g2uV4NpcLckgZ7a9n6mLvz9EhCeyku49DjjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=L9ZYt76/ySYQrvcw+7L34ol5oQ7H0/KxbLtcBNRFZeXONzh/T3NlvmyYYUhrTOtCO0+Ix0so5TvSMSKKNS51BoqljdX2f4qJ/RKfjapFe0Vwisa7FYqJj0oPaQnxW2Ow7TqkawUMGUnFdYzrctWNNVg5XHyECwUeVxRYrHolL0Q= Received: by 10.86.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr5971210fge.35.1200965681938; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.82.13 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:34:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <81bfc67a0801211734w65992bc6n710fe3937fddb97e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:34:41 -0500 From: "Caleb Cushing" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change [offtopic] In-Reply-To: <47934FEA.3080603@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_20580_29169218.1200965681922" References: <479156FF.5030508@xs4all.nl> <20080119021236.GO10389@aerie.halcy0n.com> <4791F359.1050500@gentoo.org> <47928523.2080203@xs4all.nl> <47934FEA.3080603@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b884b8f6-7cdc-44e1-b23d-3181e940c0ac X-Archives-Hash: 3979c4866aaf369705ed265fea5d37e5 ------=_Part_20580_29169218.1200965681922 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Jan 20, 2008 8:43 AM, Richard Freeman wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: > > ..very offtopic but how are you all compiling stuff like firefox on a > > ram disk. Or is 8GB of ram very cheap suddenly? > not to mention, last time I checked open office only required ~2GB of space to compile and it takes more than firefox. Most apps can be done in less than 512MB -- Caleb Cushing I currently only check my email once or twice a week, due to lack of internet in home. I apologize for the inconvenience ------=_Part_20580_29169218.1200965681922 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Jan 20, 2008 8:43 AM, Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
> ..very offtopic but how are you all compiling stuff like firefox on a
> ram disk. Or is 8GB of ram very cheap suddenly?

not to mention, last time I checked open office only required ~2GB of space to compile and it takes more than firefox. Most apps can be done in less than 512MB

--
Caleb Cushing

I currently only check my email once or twice a week, due to lack of internet in home. I apologize for the inconvenience ------=_Part_20580_29169218.1200965681922-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list