From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeJ46-0000d1-0Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:19:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jALLIN89023436; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:18:23 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jALLGXmH010080 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:16:33 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A12E9A81C7 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:16:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25335-02 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:16:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421109A818F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:16:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:16:16 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <811401824.20051121221616@gentoo.org> To: Renat Golubchyk Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051121201647.4f14cb89@mating-tux.renatik.de> References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <20051121201647.4f14cb89@mating-tux.renatik.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.393 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.014, SPF_NEUTRAL=1.379] X-Spam-Score: 1.393 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: 40f39c21-dba0-451e-b0a5-7ad965aeb1dc X-Archives-Hash: 320e7e231af56e95b1e9ca1e32a4826b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 21.11.2005, 20:16:47, Renat Golubchyk wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:37:00 -0600 Lance Albertson > wrote: > Variable names and commands are bright blue in the old docs. The new > color is darker and that does not improve readability since the > contrast is not optimal. I think a brighter tint would make it easier > to distinguish the text color from the (highlighted) parts. > Cheers, > Renat Was like that originally, looked pretty bad and distracting. - -- jakub -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDgjknhxfV/c66PZ4RAg/gAJ0c30PyYH49Hjt8XionDC+a3JAGZgCfUaE1 IKq3wzs1zG+UcgwNA7ypYQ4= =Dxaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list