From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1570715817D for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0103DE2B39; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6400E2B34 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <809db21cf013a72ece7df9530d90168b3daa6bd9.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Commit tags for resolutions OBSOLETE, PKGREMOVED From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:50:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+IU0nfp1jM8i7RGd/B9m" User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 91745251-14ab-4aaf-9978-aad545a9fc94 X-Archives-Hash: e122c774b28f9f9513a2459891a3fdf3 --=-+IU0nfp1jM8i7RGd/B9m Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 09:50 +0000, Lucio Sauer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I wrote patches for infra's git hooks[1] and pkgdev[2] that add two new > commit tags to support the automatic closure of bugs with resolutions > other than FIXED. > However, I am not entirely convinced that the meaning of the chosen tags > is self-evident enough for a third party to understand them at a glance. >=20 > Feel free to comment on my propsals or suggest alternatives! You'll > hopefully be using them frequently :) >=20 I think it would be less confusing to have an optional arg to Closes, something like: Closes[PKGREMOVED]: ... --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-+IU0nfp1jM8i7RGd/B9m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmZwIxISHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOBwEIAJFvCWaX/bc7ons3uvWJL6d01MtwiUfx 6he2nXcciaw+arPP1JcUcw2w80G1agr8QXNGk75q7RBrNKvpmcaoTK7WOHnBGcHC +lWUGWWDBaMGlt3uCBAxbOEMvWUhoSaso3wmneEjZ/CR7q3TfKcSQ2RsG6P2ICkW /Lw9cPr20KVzieAwtZ72aw+tZlgfNUnFrdv8rX75EHRY7EKBAQXv/ARhJnw1uwYF 4b5VCwP35Wc4B7ziuKcDMD25qPWNI7/uxFtXjEGEe5Wg15HqOBeYmgqMbgQHtjgZ Z/MTF01FRYmApPcF+wW1Xx1jPQILC9RIvE/qDqxAg9w5zwo/iUB65FA= =JjS1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+IU0nfp1jM8i7RGd/B9m--